WEBVTT 00:00.880 --> 00:03.740 so the search respectfully , the $30 00:03.740 --> 00:05.940 million cost for those six planes 00:05.940 --> 00:07.996 accounted for the induction of those 00:07.996 --> 00:11.830 aircraft into long term storage on the 00:13.210 --> 00:16.780 the work required to preserve them in 00:16.780 --> 00:19.020 that condition . So that's not work 00:19.020 --> 00:20.798 that we normally would do to an 00:20.798 --> 00:22.798 aircraft on a flight line , because 00:22.798 --> 00:24.798 ultimately our goal , our objective 00:24.798 --> 00:26.853 there is to continue to fly them . I 00:26.853 --> 00:26.530 could certainly get you a breakdown of 00:26.530 --> 00:28.880 the costs associated with that entry 00:28.880 --> 00:31.047 into long term storage and then , with 00:31.047 --> 00:33.213 the annual costs , are associated with 00:33.213 --> 00:36.450 storage of those Turkish jets . Now , I 00:36.460 --> 00:38.460 have been surprised finding we have 00:38.460 --> 00:40.460 these contracts being renewed every 00:40.460 --> 00:42.460 year and then still , the contracts 00:42.460 --> 00:44.571 don't seem to be getting any better . 00:44.571 --> 00:46.738 Are their performance metrics that are 00:46.738 --> 00:49.071 required penalties for not meeting them ? 00:49.071 --> 00:51.293 Um , I mean , these are things that are 00:51.293 --> 00:53.460 seen basic in the corporate world that 00:53.460 --> 00:55.627 we seem to have a hard time doing when 00:55.627 --> 00:57.571 it comes to military contracting . 00:57.700 --> 01:00.170 Congressman , I'd like to address that . 01:00.180 --> 01:03.580 I was in industry for 33 years before 01:03.580 --> 01:06.050 taking this job about three years ago , 01:06.190 --> 01:09.800 and my primary energy has been put into 01:09.800 --> 01:12.570 rewriting the opposition system for the 01:12.570 --> 01:14.681 department of defense . So we used to 01:14.681 --> 01:17.950 have one large one size fits all system , 01:18.400 --> 01:20.567 and we've broken that system down into 01:20.567 --> 01:22.800 six individual pathways . So , for 01:22.800 --> 01:24.800 instance , for talking About Oden , 01:24.800 --> 01:27.530 which is the upgrade from Alice , were 01:27.530 --> 01:30.860 using modern software techniques on 01:30.860 --> 01:33.200 that . So we are tailoring to your 01:33.200 --> 01:35.950 specific questions about sustainment . 01:36.040 --> 01:38.840 What we're doing is refining the 01:38.840 --> 01:41.520 incentive fee structure , going back 01:41.520 --> 01:43.742 and getting the voice of the customer , 01:43.742 --> 01:46.670 understanding what it takes to get 01:46.680 --> 01:50.050 aircraft operational and making 01:50.050 --> 01:53.770 sure that as we write in Senate fees , 01:53.780 --> 01:56.020 there is a very clear linkage there . 01:56.150 --> 01:58.340 Additionally , we've said multiple 01:58.340 --> 02:00.562 times this morning that one of the root 02:00.562 --> 02:02.680 causes of the eels problems in the or 02:02.680 --> 02:06.520 if I problems are Alice thesis oft 02:06.520 --> 02:08.670 where system we used to collect data 02:08.680 --> 02:11.110 and maintain the information . That's 02:11.110 --> 02:13.460 an out of date system and what we're 02:13.460 --> 02:16.330 doing in developing Oden , its 02:16.330 --> 02:18.650 replacement is going directly to the 02:18.650 --> 02:20.706 maintainers and getting the voice of 02:20.706 --> 02:22.890 the customer to make sure we drive 02:22.890 --> 02:25.870 software requirements from frontline 02:25.880 --> 02:28.830 user what they need versus someone 02:28.830 --> 02:30.886 sitting in a lab , deciding that for 02:30.886 --> 02:33.240 them , thank you . My time's expired 02:33.240 --> 02:35.240 out to say it's extremely important 02:35.240 --> 02:37.462 that we owe It's an American taxpayer . 02:37.462 --> 02:39.629 It's a patriotic duty to do this right 02:39.629 --> 02:41.684 efficiently and require Locky to pay 02:41.684 --> 02:43.962 penalties when they don't get it right . 02:45.100 --> 02:47.840 Mr . Steele back Germany goes back 02:47.850 --> 02:50.017 Chair recognizes ranking member . Mr . 02:50.017 --> 02:51.850 Chairman , I asked for unanimous 02:51.850 --> 02:53.961 consent to clarify Mr Almost response 02:53.961 --> 02:56.560 to my questions . First , you're second 02:56.560 --> 03:00.410 quarter profit is $1.6 billion . 03:01.150 --> 03:03.840 Second , your fiscal year , 19 profit 03:03.840 --> 03:07.580 was $6.2 billion . So I 03:07.580 --> 03:11.210 renew my question , which was , why is 03:11.210 --> 03:13.321 lucky failing to fulfill the contract 03:13.730 --> 03:16.550 and deliver ills intact and on time 03:17.240 --> 03:20.970 and ask for these documents to be in 03:20.970 --> 03:24.680 the record and you repeat your 03:24.680 --> 03:28.350 question . Right ? OK , so , Mr Palmer , 03:28.350 --> 03:30.683 I hope you heard that without objection . 03:30.683 --> 03:33.560 The documents are accepted . Chair now 03:33.560 --> 03:35.970 recognizes the gentleman from Virginia , 03:35.970 --> 03:39.200 Mr Conley for five minutes . Thank you , 03:39.200 --> 03:41.550 Mr Chairman . That thank you for this 03:41.560 --> 03:45.380 day has some rapid park questions of 03:45.390 --> 03:48.970 this more . What's unique about the 35 03:49.100 --> 03:52.370 program ? There are a long list of 03:52.370 --> 03:54.537 things that make it a unique program , 03:54.537 --> 03:56.703 but about many different things . It's 03:56.703 --> 03:58.537 it's one . It's an international 03:58.537 --> 04:00.870 program . It's not just a U . S program , 04:00.870 --> 04:02.814 so international partners put some 04:02.814 --> 04:05.770 proposes allies like the British and 04:05.780 --> 04:08.002 the National strategies have a voice in 04:08.002 --> 04:11.100 decision look , lovely interrupt . But 04:11.110 --> 04:14.660 isn't there something else ? The J 35 04:14.670 --> 04:18.380 is me . The F 35 is replacing . Always 04:18.390 --> 04:20.950 strike fighters , right ? Yes , it's 04:20.950 --> 04:22.894 designed to replace a number of of 04:22.894 --> 04:25.061 legacy fighters across three different 04:25.061 --> 04:27.228 services the Brink or the Navy and the 04:27.228 --> 04:29.339 air cliffs . And we haven't done that 04:29.339 --> 04:31.506 before . We've never We've never had a 04:31.506 --> 04:33.561 single system that was designed over 04:33.561 --> 04:35.561 fresh . Three different . So that's 04:35.561 --> 04:37.561 what's unique . The stakes here are 04:37.561 --> 04:39.450 enormous . They affect all of our 04:39.450 --> 04:41.617 services were never done this before , 04:41.617 --> 04:44.360 and it's a critical piece of US defence 04:44.410 --> 04:47.980 and offensive capability as well . Um , 04:48.310 --> 04:52.270 you g a o this more , uh , going back 04:52.270 --> 04:56.130 to 2014 . Provided a number 04:56.140 --> 04:59.710 of recommendations . Two D o . 04:59.710 --> 05:02.910 D . The project manager , which we have 05:02.920 --> 05:06.560 focused on a lot yet including trying 05:06.560 --> 05:08.782 to create a performance measurement for 05:08.782 --> 05:11.380 Alice back in 20 September 2014 were 05:11.380 --> 05:13.713 those recommendations adopted by the OD . 05:14.730 --> 05:16.786 That specific recommendation has not 05:16.786 --> 05:18.841 been adopted , repeated again in our 05:18.841 --> 05:21.063 March 2020 report and permitted over to 05:21.063 --> 05:23.286 conferences to get Congress take action 05:23.340 --> 05:26.370 should sure that that happens , So 05:27.140 --> 05:29.750 oh , why did happen ? 05:32.840 --> 05:35.062 I mean , get over one today . You think 05:35.200 --> 05:37.710 with the stakes this high on this 05:37.710 --> 05:40.270 unique program D o . D . Would run that 05:40.270 --> 05:43.360 walk to make corrections to a system 05:43.560 --> 05:45.671 that was defective and you documented 05:45.671 --> 05:48.970 it back in 2014 6 years ago . I 05:48.970 --> 05:51.081 completely agree . We definitely want 05:51.081 --> 05:53.081 to see you dampen that . All of our 05:53.081 --> 05:55.026 recommendations desperate , but as 05:55.026 --> 05:57.192 possible about my court concerned that 05:57.192 --> 05:59.303 haven't done it yet . Why , Why not ? 05:59.303 --> 06:01.470 Well , over the years we've heard from 06:01.470 --> 06:01.100 them that they have a number of other 06:01.190 --> 06:03.357 issues to address for the up 30 flight 06:03.357 --> 06:05.412 program we're talking about today is 06:05.412 --> 06:07.634 one of many sustainment challenges that 06:07.634 --> 06:09.523 they're facing . It's also a very 06:09.523 --> 06:11.746 difficult thing for them to do , but we 06:11.746 --> 06:13.857 think it's vital because it will . It 06:13.857 --> 06:16.079 happens . I never know what what's good 06:16.079 --> 06:18.246 enough when it's going to be . But now 06:18.246 --> 06:20.357 we're in a place where sustainment is 06:20.357 --> 06:22.468 the major problem in the guest , uh , 06:22.468 --> 06:24.634 35% because they ignored it . You were 06:24.634 --> 06:26.801 recommendations and those of the D . O 06:26.801 --> 06:28.370 d I g . Miss Help were your 06:28.370 --> 06:30.590 recommendations over the years 06:30.600 --> 06:32.656 implemented by the project in a spin 06:32.656 --> 06:35.420 offs . The Joint Program office agreed 06:35.420 --> 06:38.550 to our recommendations in our June 2020 06:38.550 --> 06:41.270 19 report . However , we're waiting for 06:41.270 --> 06:43.326 supporting documentation to validate 06:43.326 --> 06:45.048 that they have implemented the 06:45.048 --> 06:47.760 recommendations . In your testimony , 06:47.770 --> 06:50.870 you gave us a long laundry list of 06:50.870 --> 06:53.770 issues that were seemingly cavalierly 06:53.780 --> 06:56.950 ignored by the Joint program office 06:57.490 --> 06:59.434 over the years . Is that correct ? 07:02.440 --> 07:06.120 Uh , yes . I touched on the Ile 07:06.130 --> 07:08.241 issues , sir . And then they also the 07:08.241 --> 07:11.310 incentive fees . And even when they 07:11.310 --> 07:13.366 were getting feedback from the field 07:13.740 --> 07:16.900 from pilots from command centers in the 07:16.900 --> 07:20.500 light , they still didn't changes . 07:20.820 --> 07:23.310 That would have gone some way . We're 07:23.320 --> 07:25.653 Ameliorating problems . Is that correct ? 07:26.030 --> 07:28.250 The joint program office in October of 07:28.260 --> 07:31.690 2018 issued guidance allowing the 07:31.700 --> 07:33.922 parts to go on the aircraft without the 07:33.922 --> 07:36.630 Elektronik equipment , logbooks and 07:36.640 --> 07:39.860 additional labor duty . Labor was used 07:39.870 --> 07:42.240 with workarounds to make sure the parts 07:42.240 --> 07:44.573 could get on the aircraft for it to fly . 07:45.940 --> 07:48.150 The Alice program we're talking about 07:48.160 --> 07:50.390 that was created by Lockheed just for 07:50.390 --> 07:53.850 this program . Is that correct ? While 07:53.850 --> 07:55.920 Alice wasn't a direct focus of our 07:55.920 --> 07:58.142 report is my understanding that that is 07:58.142 --> 08:01.760 true eyes that your understanding this 08:01.760 --> 08:04.950 more Yes , Alice was created 08:04.950 --> 08:08.450 specifically for the F 35 and , 08:08.940 --> 08:11.450 UH , it was approved by the Joint 08:12.240 --> 08:14.600 Project office . Is that correct ? That 08:14.600 --> 08:16.767 is correct . It was approved nearly 20 08:16.767 --> 08:20.660 years ago , 20 years ago , so has 08:20.670 --> 08:23.210 been updated . It's been updated 08:23.210 --> 08:26.200 several times that did not go fully . 08:26.200 --> 08:28.033 Operate . Alice did not go fully 08:28.033 --> 08:30.311 operational . It's about two years ago , 08:30.311 --> 08:32.510 2018 at a number of problems all over 08:32.510 --> 08:35.160 when getting rolled out , there been a 08:35.160 --> 08:37.820 number of updates . But the central 08:37.820 --> 08:40.220 problem is it's never that user needs . 08:40.240 --> 08:42.100 We've heard some the helmets 08:42.100 --> 08:43.822 neighborhoods got better , and 08:43.822 --> 08:46.640 certainly it's downloading faster , and 08:46.880 --> 08:49.390 users conflict things faster . But the 08:49.390 --> 08:51.501 bottom line is there . No performance 08:51.501 --> 08:53.612 measures in place to assess for their 08:53.612 --> 08:55.779 users are getting what they and heat . 08:55.779 --> 08:57.723 So that's in places that we're not 08:57.723 --> 08:59.946 going to know when it's good in our And 08:59.946 --> 09:01.779 for the record , you advised the 09:01.779 --> 09:03.779 Department of Defense six years ago 09:03.779 --> 09:06.112 that it needed such performance metrics . 09:06.112 --> 09:08.030 Yes , we get record production 09:08.040 --> 09:10.096 department , and they did not act on 09:10.096 --> 09:12.210 that recommendation . They have taken 09:12.210 --> 09:14.043 some actions , but it's not been 09:14.043 --> 09:16.377 sufficiently close to my final question . 09:16.377 --> 09:18.750 Mr . Chairman , this more had they 09:18.760 --> 09:20.871 accepted that recommendation when you 09:20.871 --> 09:22.982 made it . Do you believe that some of 09:22.982 --> 09:25.149 the problems were chronicling today in 09:25.149 --> 09:27.316 this hearing Could have been avoided ? 09:28.140 --> 09:29.918 Yes . I think if they had fully 09:29.918 --> 09:32.084 implemented the recommendation at such 09:32.084 --> 09:34.196 nice 15 or 2016 accretive potentially 09:34.196 --> 09:36.307 investigated a number of the problems 09:36.307 --> 09:38.418 you talked about . I would just say , 09:38.418 --> 09:40.640 Mr Chairman , we focused on correctly , 09:40.640 --> 09:43.100 you know , the shortcomings of the 09:43.100 --> 09:45.070 contractor . But we also as the 09:45.070 --> 09:47.360 oversight committee , need to focus on 09:47.360 --> 09:49.580 the shortcomings of the management of 09:49.580 --> 09:51.747 contracting and the contractor . And I 09:51.747 --> 09:54.060 think this hearing and this testimony 09:54.060 --> 09:56.171 we just heard from this columnist for 09:56.240 --> 09:58.360 certainly should give us pause about 09:58.360 --> 10:00.860 how confident the oversight management 10:00.900 --> 10:03.680 of the single most important new 10:03.980 --> 10:06.147 fighter aircraft in the history of the 10:06.147 --> 10:08.650 United States has been . You back . 10:10.940 --> 10:12.996 Think of the gentleman . Yields back 10:12.996 --> 10:15.162 the chair now recognizes the gentleman 10:15.162 --> 10:17.496 from Ohio , Mr Gibbs , for five minutes . 10:17.496 --> 10:19.662 Thank you , Mr Chairman . Mr . Almer , 10:19.662 --> 10:22.620 I hope you're still there . Do Legacy 10:22.620 --> 10:25.980 aircraft have heels ? I'm sorry , 10:25.980 --> 10:28.147 Congressman . Repeat the question . Do 10:28.147 --> 10:31.120 legacy aircraft have heels ? No , sir . 10:31.340 --> 10:34.490 No congressman . So I guess my thought 10:34.490 --> 10:37.350 is is because because the F 35 is such 10:37.350 --> 10:40.580 a sophisticated , complicated , highly 10:40.580 --> 10:42.980 technological aircraft is Is that the 10:42.980 --> 10:45.258 reason why I had the program for years ? 10:45.258 --> 10:49.110 How do you or how do you do it with the 10:49.120 --> 10:52.920 legacy aircraft for parts more 10:52.920 --> 10:54.864 sing ? Yes , sir . The maintenance 10:54.864 --> 10:56.990 system for legacy airplanes are more 10:57.500 --> 10:59.650 segregated , Not integrated systems 10:59.650 --> 11:03.470 that support specific platforms . So 11:03.470 --> 11:06.680 this is , Ah , attempt . The the Alice 11:06.690 --> 11:08.760 in the electronic equipment logbook 11:08.760 --> 11:11.820 approach relative to the technology 11:12.210 --> 11:13.877 really is about an integrated 11:13.890 --> 11:15.880 sustainment . Says I t sustainment 11:15.880 --> 11:18.720 system for a platform . Okay , General 11:18.720 --> 11:22.470 thick . Do the deals pose any 11:22.470 --> 11:24.350 safety concern of risk ? Is that 11:27.140 --> 11:29.251 so ? My understanding from talking to 11:29.251 --> 11:31.473 the maintenance group commanders in the 11:31.473 --> 11:33.696 field that authorized their aircraft to 11:33.696 --> 11:35.918 fly in the event that apart is not . Or 11:35.918 --> 11:37.862 if I there is not a safety concern 11:37.862 --> 11:39.918 associated with flying aircraft with 11:39.918 --> 11:42.140 those parts , they will not . They will 11:42.140 --> 11:44.307 not allow apart to be installed in the 11:44.307 --> 11:46.584 aircraft , if that's okay . I got that . 11:46.584 --> 11:48.807 So So So the issue is not getting those 11:48.807 --> 11:50.973 parts readily available and in place . 11:50.973 --> 11:50.700 So they're crafting flies . That's what 11:50.700 --> 11:54.600 the issue is . So I guess the next that 11:54.600 --> 11:57.910 would be how how much delay our , 11:58.540 --> 12:01.600 uh you know , f 35 have been grounded . 12:01.690 --> 12:03.610 You know what , where we are that 12:04.620 --> 12:06.842 because of that because of that ? So we 12:06.842 --> 12:09.280 have . We have mixed data from our 12:09.300 --> 12:11.467 those commanders in the field relative 12:11.467 --> 12:13.689 to the times at which they have allowed 12:13.689 --> 12:15.800 those aircraft to fly without heels . 12:15.800 --> 12:17.800 We have really good air information 12:17.800 --> 12:19.911 from from one of the installations in 12:19.911 --> 12:22.022 particular that we're using T kind of 12:22.022 --> 12:24.244 sort through and figure out well , I'll 12:24.244 --> 12:26.356 call an adjudication of what the rial 12:26.356 --> 12:28.467 impact would be from a cost incentive 12:28.467 --> 12:30.689 perspective . We have other information 12:30.689 --> 12:32.633 from other wings that is less less 12:32.633 --> 12:34.689 clear . And then still other wings . 12:34.689 --> 12:36.744 I'll say the Navy , the Marine Corps 12:36.744 --> 12:38.633 particular , are not allowing the 12:38.633 --> 12:40.689 aircraft to fly period with Nana fry 12:40.689 --> 12:42.744 parts , so there's not an issue with 12:42.744 --> 12:46.010 them . Okay , um , I just heard . I 12:46.020 --> 12:49.390 guess the person with their office 12:49.720 --> 12:52.140 talking about the Alice program just 12:52.140 --> 12:54.251 rolled out two years ago . But then I 12:54.251 --> 12:56.900 heard earlier testimony that it was a 12:56.900 --> 12:59.067 program that started way before that . 12:59.067 --> 13:01.233 Is that so ? Alice has been around for 13:01.233 --> 13:03.344 a long , long time . I don't know . I 13:03.344 --> 13:05.400 think 2000 and I did hear it doesn't 13:05.400 --> 13:07.567 have the technology of the iPhone that 13:07.567 --> 13:10.930 the newer Softwares and stuff . And so 13:11.020 --> 13:14.090 whose fault sat ? I mean , is that 13:14.090 --> 13:16.780 discovered bureaucracy ? Or is that was 13:16.780 --> 13:18.947 that was that was that happened at the 13:18.947 --> 13:21.224 Fokker has been around for a long time , 13:21.224 --> 13:23.447 but I just got rolled out two years ago 13:23.447 --> 13:25.447 with technology that's out 10 years 13:25.447 --> 13:27.502 outdated . Eso the first . I can get 13:27.502 --> 13:27.310 you the exact date , sir . But the 13:27.310 --> 13:29.254 first Alice versions , I believe , 13:29.254 --> 13:32.230 rolled out in the 6 4007 timeframe and 13:32.230 --> 13:34.450 have been updated on a 12 to 18 months 13:34.750 --> 13:36.806 and McCain's . Since then . We had a 13:36.806 --> 13:39.680 substantial update to the Alice system 13:39.680 --> 13:41.791 as we entered I O . T . And he and we 13:41.791 --> 13:44.330 have continued to update from was what ? 13:44.330 --> 13:46.330 When I entered the program a couple 13:46.330 --> 13:48.386 years back , it was Alice . 2.0 , we 13:48.386 --> 13:51.540 moved 2.4 . We moved to 30 or 31 The 13:51.540 --> 13:53.800 version in the field today that 87% of 13:53.800 --> 13:57.160 the units have is Alice 3.5 point two , 13:57.600 --> 13:59.780 which is the most recent innovation . 13:59.930 --> 14:01.874 Greg mentioned that we're going to 14:01.874 --> 14:04.097 quarterly release around time . I would 14:04.097 --> 14:06.152 ask another question . Whoever wants 14:06.152 --> 14:08.319 answer . I guess this f 35 . The whole 14:08.319 --> 14:10.097 system is . We know it's high , 14:10.097 --> 14:12.319 sophisticated , very complicated . High 14:12.319 --> 14:14.430 technology , technological is it ? Is 14:14.430 --> 14:16.380 it fair for Lockheed Martin on the 14:16.380 --> 14:19.320 contract because you're in a whole new , 14:20.610 --> 14:22.890 you know , area sophistication ? 14:24.600 --> 14:26.767 Was it right to have a contractor with 14:26.767 --> 14:28.940 they they couldn't do Because so many 14:28.940 --> 14:31.890 unknowns bringing the system on tonight 14:32.450 --> 14:34.506 is , I guess I'm just floored . That 14:34.506 --> 14:37.570 might be a question of you . We have 14:37.580 --> 14:41.420 different contract types that correlate 14:41.430 --> 14:43.790 with the risk involved . When there's , 14:43.800 --> 14:45.744 ah , high level of development and 14:45.744 --> 14:47.980 unknown . We do cost plus type 14:47.990 --> 14:50.330 contracts where we pay for what is 14:50.330 --> 14:52.497 needed , and there's a different level 14:52.497 --> 14:55.160 of fee . Then , when it's more known , 14:55.160 --> 14:57.438 when you get into full rate production , 14:57.438 --> 14:59.493 for instance , those are fixed price 14:59.493 --> 15:01.950 contracts with incentive fees for 15:01.950 --> 15:05.240 meeting certain criteria . So where we 15:05.240 --> 15:07.560 are in the Department of Defense is 15:07.560 --> 15:09.727 really working to make sure all of our 15:09.727 --> 15:12.500 contracting officers have all the 15:12.510 --> 15:14.510 different techniques , so we'll see 15:14.510 --> 15:17.050 just 35 been developing for quite a 15:17.050 --> 15:19.630 while now . They're starting do a lot 15:19.630 --> 15:21.852 more appointments . So we moved in that 15:21.852 --> 15:24.350 second face for production , and then 15:24.350 --> 15:27.010 what ? We are in the midst of doing is 15:27.010 --> 15:29.660 developing sustainment contracts that 15:29.660 --> 15:31.771 air better tailored and you're seeing 15:31.780 --> 15:33.780 Are you seeing better results now , 15:33.780 --> 15:36.002 since it's gone along with working with 15:36.002 --> 15:38.336 the manufacturer Lockheed Martin ? Well , 15:38.336 --> 15:40.558 we started out when I got involved with 15:40.558 --> 15:42.224 the program three years ago . 15:42.224 --> 15:44.447 Absolutely . From a production point of 15:44.447 --> 15:46.669 view , we got much , much more fidelity 15:46.669 --> 15:48.724 and around what was happening on the 15:48.724 --> 15:50.836 manufacturing floor . I will say that 15:50.836 --> 15:52.669 the Department of Defense has an 15:52.669 --> 15:54.891 enormous amount of data now relative to 15:54.891 --> 15:57.002 that versus where we were three weeks 15:57.002 --> 15:59.058 ago , I would say we're just turning 15:59.058 --> 16:01.250 our real focus on sustainment now and 16:01.250 --> 16:03.650 just beginning to build that robots 16:03.660 --> 16:05.950 state a set . So we have a number of 16:05.950 --> 16:08.180 teams working on the Alice to Odin 16:08.180 --> 16:10.390 transition as well as the You're 16:10.390 --> 16:12.810 confident , optimistic , that cost 16:12.810 --> 16:14.866 overruns , all that things are gonna 16:14.866 --> 16:16.977 get better improving . I am confident 16:16.977 --> 16:18.977 that we are making progress , but I 16:18.977 --> 16:20.921 think we still have a way to go in 16:20.921 --> 16:22.977 sustainment . Okay . Thank you . I'm 16:22.977 --> 16:24.921 out of time to go back . Gentleman 16:24.921 --> 16:26.977 yields back the chair now recognizes 16:26.977 --> 16:29.199 the gentleman from California , Mr Roda 16:29.520 --> 16:32.490 for five minutes . Thank you , Mr you . 16:32.490 --> 16:34.800 Mr Chair . Thank you to all of our 16:34.800 --> 16:37.120 participants . We appreciate your 16:37.120 --> 16:39.380 commitment to the security of our 16:39.380 --> 16:42.020 country , and I've got a few questions . 16:42.020 --> 16:44.380 I'd like to ask one of my main concerns 16:44.380 --> 16:47.260 with the F 35 program that if left 16:47.270 --> 16:49.870 unaddressed , problems with defective F 16:49.870 --> 16:53.160 35 spare parts will only get worse as 16:53.160 --> 16:55.160 the fleet grows . If my numbers are 16:55.160 --> 16:57.750 correct , as of February 2020 the 16:57.750 --> 17:00.860 Global F 35 fleet was about 500 17:00.870 --> 17:03.830 aircraft , but the fleet is expected to 17:03.830 --> 17:07.770 double by 2023 . The U . S alone 17:07.770 --> 17:11.630 players to purchase about 2500 F 35 17:11.810 --> 17:13.921 from Lockheed Martin over the life of 17:13.921 --> 17:16.390 the program , as was pointed out 17:16.400 --> 17:18.567 earlier , to really replace our entire 17:18.567 --> 17:21.390 fleet . That growth may be great for 17:21.400 --> 17:23.567 Lockheed Martin's bottom line . But if 17:23.567 --> 17:26.530 problems with the F 35 software , such 17:26.530 --> 17:28.690 as Alison Elektronik logs on spare 17:28.690 --> 17:30.857 parts are not thoroughly addressed and 17:30.857 --> 17:32.968 fixed , of course , the headaches for 17:32.968 --> 17:35.023 US pilots and maintenance crews will 17:35.023 --> 17:37.800 only grow . So Miss Hall , is it a fair 17:37.800 --> 17:39.633 assumption that the problems you 17:39.633 --> 17:42.580 identified in your June 2019 report 17:42.580 --> 17:45.700 will only get worse as the F 35 fleet 17:45.710 --> 17:49.610 expands ? It is true 17:49.610 --> 17:52.910 that Unless the ready for issues bear 17:52.910 --> 17:55.960 part and he'll issue is addressed , it 17:55.960 --> 17:58.780 will continue to perpetuate . And we've 17:58.780 --> 18:01.280 seen from the joint program office , 18:01.280 --> 18:03.280 you know , guidance to fly aircraft 18:03.280 --> 18:05.447 with deals . With the fleet continuing 18:05.447 --> 18:08.640 to grow , the the problems will become 18:08.640 --> 18:12.490 more pervasive unless addressed his . 18:12.490 --> 18:14.268 Now , would you agree with that 18:14.268 --> 18:17.900 assessment ? I 18:17.900 --> 18:20.150 definitely agree to The F 35 programs 18:20.160 --> 18:22.216 faces a number of challenges on this 18:22.216 --> 18:24.216 sustained in front those challenges 18:24.216 --> 18:26.216 around , exacerbated by the chicken 18:26.216 --> 18:28.438 growth besides the overall fight , both 18:28.438 --> 18:30.438 here in the United States and other 18:30.438 --> 18:32.160 advise , so they have a lot of 18:32.160 --> 18:34.160 challenges that we are encouraged . 18:34.160 --> 18:36.382 They agreed with our recommendations on 18:36.382 --> 18:38.438 sustainment . Reporters are starting 18:38.438 --> 18:40.604 conviction . Fair enough , thank you . 18:40.604 --> 18:42.827 Air Force personnel also told committee 18:42.827 --> 18:44.938 staff that if not addressed , current 18:44.938 --> 18:46.993 issues with electronic logs of spare 18:46.993 --> 18:49.340 parts will likely compound as the F 35 18:49.340 --> 18:51.396 fleet expands in additional aircraft 18:51.396 --> 18:53.410 deployed on combat missions , for 18:53.410 --> 18:55.632 example , would committee staff visited 18:55.720 --> 18:57.942 Hill Air Force Base in Utah , they were 18:57.942 --> 19:01.150 told that an F 35 squadron had received 19:01.160 --> 19:03.271 an immense amount of support when the 19:03.271 --> 19:05.493 squadron deployed in the Middle East in 19:05.493 --> 19:08.530 April 2019 . This in fact was the F 35 19:08.530 --> 19:11.120 1st time flying combat missions and 19:11.120 --> 19:13.009 everyone everyone want to see the 19:13.009 --> 19:15.176 mission succeed without a hitch . That 19:15.176 --> 19:17.342 deployment had only a handful of about 19:17.342 --> 19:20.170 35 compared to the eventual size of the 19:20.170 --> 19:22.990 anticipated fleet , and many staff were 19:22.990 --> 19:24.768 told that would be difficult to 19:24.768 --> 19:26.823 maintain that level support . As you 19:26.823 --> 19:28.934 have 35 fleet grew in the demand from 19:28.934 --> 19:30.879 violence . Maintainers and support 19:30.879 --> 19:33.750 personnel grew along with it . Mr Armor , 19:33.860 --> 19:36.027 the most recent combat deployment of F 19:36.027 --> 19:38.720 35 from Hill Air Force Base at 19:38.730 --> 19:42.470 beginning of June . If their deployment 19:42.480 --> 19:44.813 follows past ones , that should be home . 19:44.813 --> 19:47.036 I think in about six months , Mr Omar , 19:47.036 --> 19:49.202 can you commit today that the problems 19:49.202 --> 19:51.202 with electronic logs on spare parts 19:51.202 --> 19:53.424 will be fixed by the term that squadron 19:53.424 --> 19:56.170 comes home , Congressman , And it'll 19:56.170 --> 19:58.337 take us more than that time to resolve 19:58.337 --> 20:00.392 these issues . But we are focused to 20:00.392 --> 20:03.110 resolve these issues . I appreciate 20:03.110 --> 20:05.440 your candor , Lieutenant General Thick , 20:05.450 --> 20:07.617 Mr . Omer . Lockheed Martin can't meet 20:07.617 --> 20:09.740 that commitment . How will the joint 20:09.740 --> 20:11.740 Program office a Defense Department 20:11.740 --> 20:13.851 ensure our pilots are fully supported 20:13.851 --> 20:17.710 other future deployments ? So , Mr 20:17.710 --> 20:20.840 Congressman , we have put language in 20:20.840 --> 20:24.070 place in our 19 and 20 r F 1 19 and 20 20:24.070 --> 20:27.370 spares contract that requires eels on . 20:27.560 --> 20:29.671 I'm sorry . That requires parts to be 20:29.671 --> 20:31.838 or if I upon delivery . So we have set 20:31.838 --> 20:34.160 the stake in the sand relative to the 20:34.170 --> 20:35.948 delivery of those parts . We're 20:35.948 --> 20:39.150 committed to working with the services 20:39.160 --> 20:41.160 with Lockheed Martin and with other 20:42.030 --> 20:45.670 industry best best partners to In Stan . 20:45.670 --> 20:48.740 She ate Oden as the solution to the 20:48.750 --> 20:50.990 problem problems that we continue 20:50.990 --> 20:54.150 tohave in . Alice . Andi , I firmly 20:54.150 --> 20:56.261 believe that Thean Stan shih ation of 20:56.261 --> 20:58.510 Oden is the is the intervention 20:58.510 --> 21:01.610 required to most completely address the 21:01.610 --> 21:03.332 issue with non Or if I parts . 21:05.590 --> 21:07.800 Thank you . We all know these problems 21:07.800 --> 21:10.022 have to be fixed , that they need to be 21:10.022 --> 21:12.330 fixed before the F 35 fleet is so large 21:12.600 --> 21:14.711 that problems with missing electronic 21:14.711 --> 21:16.544 logs , effective spare parts and 21:16.544 --> 21:18.767 continuing software glitch just are not 21:18.767 --> 21:20.933 so overwhelming . It cannot be fixed . 21:20.933 --> 21:22.989 And with that , I yield back . Thank 21:22.989 --> 21:26.440 you , Mr Chair . I now 21:26.440 --> 21:29.600 recognize Mr Higgins . Mr . Higgins . 21:32.640 --> 21:35.180 Thank you about your can't crack and 21:35.180 --> 21:36.180 member . 21:39.550 --> 21:40.994 Thank you , Madam . Chair 21:42.900 --> 21:46.700 General picked Americans 21:46.700 --> 21:50.200 want air dominance worldwide . 21:50.610 --> 21:54.410 My military forces and the 21:54.420 --> 21:57.070 parents and families of our pilots . I 21:57.080 --> 21:59.130 want those pilot pilot step total 21:59.130 --> 22:02.090 confidence in their aircraft . We're 22:02.100 --> 22:06.090 focused primarily today or talking 22:06.090 --> 22:09.790 about issues we have with Elektronik 22:09.790 --> 22:13.700 equipment logbook , the hell and 22:13.860 --> 22:17.350 the classification off missing . He'll 22:17.350 --> 22:20.610 data in replacement parts for the up 35 22:20.610 --> 22:24.410 platform , um , would be considered non 22:24.410 --> 22:26.900 or if I were not ready for issues 22:28.200 --> 22:31.430 absent those problems as we as we work 22:31.430 --> 22:35.210 through those issues . General pick , 22:35.210 --> 22:38.500 do you consider the F 35 to be the 22:38.500 --> 22:41.810 platform that delivers air dominance 22:42.150 --> 22:43.983 for the United States of America 22:43.983 --> 22:46.850 Worldwide ? I absolutely do . 22:48.700 --> 22:51.300 Thank you . That's what we're looking 22:51.310 --> 22:54.590 for . And as we address the problems 22:54.590 --> 22:56.770 we're discussing today , which I have 22:56.780 --> 22:59.380 complete confidence that Lockheed 22:59.380 --> 23:02.110 Martin is dedicated to resolve . So I 23:02.110 --> 23:04.950 turned my my question to Mr Omer . 23:05.870 --> 23:09.700 Um , things Domer are sustainment 23:09.700 --> 23:13.460 costs , but they have 35 Stanley 23:13.460 --> 23:16.890 coming down , Congressman . 23:17.390 --> 23:19.279 For every dollar of sustainment , 23:19.279 --> 23:21.730 approximately 39 cents is Lockheed 23:21.730 --> 23:25.270 Martin contributes to about 13% . 13 23:25.270 --> 23:27.270 cents has to do with the propulsion 23:27.270 --> 23:29.326 system , and the remainder has to do 23:29.326 --> 23:31.492 with operational sustainment costs for 23:31.492 --> 23:34.360 the government . Lockheed Martin , in 23:34.360 --> 23:36.760 the interest of fine , let me just 23:37.150 --> 23:39.650 America needs to know , You know , we 23:39.650 --> 23:42.560 recognize that there are problems with 23:43.110 --> 23:45.510 with the full deployment manufacturer 23:45.510 --> 23:48.750 and perfection off this of this world 23:48.750 --> 23:51.910 class aircraft that Lockheed Martin is 23:51.920 --> 23:54.220 delivering for our nation and for 23:54.220 --> 23:56.650 freedoms purpose across the world . We 23:56.650 --> 23:59.000 need to know our sustainment costs 23:59.000 --> 24:01.780 steadily coming down and yes or no . 24:02.740 --> 24:04.796 Yes , they are . The Lockheed Martin 24:04.796 --> 24:07.018 elements of sustainment costs have come 24:07.018 --> 24:09.240 down 44% from a cost per flying hour in 24:09.240 --> 24:11.351 the last five years . There are other 24:11.351 --> 24:15.190 indicators on the or the seal the 24:15.200 --> 24:17.950 deal non or if I issues , is that being 24:17.950 --> 24:20.060 aggressive looking alive ? 24:21.840 --> 24:23.951 Yes , sir , We're aggressively engage 24:23.951 --> 24:26.173 to resolve that issue with our with our 24:26.173 --> 24:29.910 customer , right ? And a part or 24:29.910 --> 24:32.180 component that's that's missing . He'll 24:32.180 --> 24:35.530 data is then considered non . Or if I , 24:35.530 --> 24:37.570 my colleagues that refer to it as 24:37.570 --> 24:40.470 defective , does that part work . Will 24:40.470 --> 24:43.060 the plane fly ? If that technician 24:43.060 --> 24:46.960 manually updates that congressman , 24:46.960 --> 24:49.016 there's no issue with the part . The 24:49.016 --> 24:51.071 part is not defective . The issue is 24:51.071 --> 24:53.071 with the Elektronik file associated 24:53.071 --> 24:55.404 with the part understood would just Yes , 24:55.404 --> 24:57.460 sir , we're clarifying for America . 24:57.460 --> 24:59.571 It's important that we know regarding 24:59.571 --> 25:01.738 with the progress that Lockheed Martin 25:01.738 --> 25:04.300 has made in the engine . You can you 25:04.300 --> 25:06.660 clarify ? According to my research , 25:06.930 --> 25:10.510 production since 2017 has 25:11.410 --> 25:14.900 shown ability to consistently deliver 25:14.990 --> 25:17.400 zero defect aircraft since 2000 25:17.400 --> 25:21.200 sittings 70 Sir , we have ah , very 25:21.200 --> 25:24.160 strong track record , actually , multi 25:24.160 --> 25:26.260 years relative to zero defect 25:26.270 --> 25:28.159 deliveries . We are less than one 25:28.159 --> 25:30.640 defect for delivery for the last 25:30.640 --> 25:33.510 several years . That thank you for that 25:33.510 --> 25:37.080 response , sir . General Pick in his in 25:37.080 --> 25:40.610 his opening statement . And And I quote , 25:40.610 --> 25:42.770 he said , The bottom line is we need 25:42.770 --> 25:45.190 parts delivered on time with all 25:45.190 --> 25:47.460 required electronic identification 25:47.460 --> 25:51.310 markings and records right upon arrival . 25:51.550 --> 25:55.430 Um , Mr Omer , when can we get there ? 25:55.440 --> 25:57.740 Are you optimistic we're going in that 25:57.740 --> 26:01.610 direction and get in there quickly . So 26:01.610 --> 26:03.850 we're optimistic we can get above 90% 26:03.860 --> 26:05.970 by the end of this year , as General 26:05.970 --> 26:07.970 fake alluded to . We're going to be 26:07.970 --> 26:10.830 challenged to achieve 99% ready for 26:10.830 --> 26:12.890 issue . And we're taking the actions 26:12.890 --> 26:14.946 necessary to support that metric and 26:14.946 --> 26:17.168 requirement by our customer . Thank you 26:17.168 --> 26:19.279 for your response , Madam Chair . Let 26:19.279 --> 26:21.557 me say that my father was a Navy pilot . 26:21.557 --> 26:23.557 World War two . I'm a veteran . And 26:23.557 --> 26:26.130 yesterday I spoke with a dear friend of 26:26.130 --> 26:29.920 mine whose son is a pilot for the Navy . 26:29.920 --> 26:32.370 And he shared the concern of parents 26:32.370 --> 26:35.800 and families across the country that 26:35.810 --> 26:38.880 their concern is that there that our 26:38.890 --> 26:41.360 pilots are flying planes , that they 26:41.490 --> 26:43.750 and all that . Thank you for holding 26:43.760 --> 26:45.640 this meeting today . I think the 26:45.640 --> 26:47.860 ranking member and I think that the 26:47.860 --> 26:50.170 witnesses were testifying today . We're 26:50.170 --> 26:52.226 working through these issues , and I 26:52.226 --> 26:56.010 have total faith in the F 35 jet and 26:56.010 --> 26:57.700 Lockheed Martin and I you 27:02.990 --> 27:05.280 I thank the gentleman for his questions 27:05.280 --> 27:07.740 in his statement , and I now yield uh , 27:08.160 --> 27:11.280 such five minutes to congresswoman spot 27:11.480 --> 27:14.030 Jackie Spear . Thank you , Madam Chair . 27:14.030 --> 27:16.310 Thank you all for participating today . 27:16.840 --> 27:19.260 Let me ask you a question , Lieutenant 27:19.260 --> 27:22.450 General , there's no question that the 27:22.460 --> 27:24.293 Alice system is underperformed . 27:24.293 --> 27:27.820 Correct ? Uh , yes . More , this Lord . 27:29.320 --> 27:33.170 Absolutely . This Mr Elmer , is it true 27:33.180 --> 27:37.060 that it has underperformed ? It's 27:37.060 --> 27:38.949 not being our customer warfighter 27:38.949 --> 27:41.171 requirement . It is underperformed . It 27:41.171 --> 27:43.760 has been anticipated that there's 27:43.770 --> 27:47.750 $183 million that Lockheed Martin 27:47.760 --> 27:50.570 owes The taxpayers is country for this 27:50.580 --> 27:52.691 under performance . How much time has 27:52.691 --> 27:54.780 been spent negotiating with Lockheed 27:54.780 --> 27:57.790 Martin and how , how long and how much 27:57.790 --> 27:59.346 time , Lieutenant general . 28:02.710 --> 28:05.180 So my recollection , ma'am , is that 28:05.190 --> 28:06.900 the negotiations specifically 28:06.900 --> 28:09.120 associated with the the consideration 28:09.120 --> 28:11.940 on heels began in earnest in April of 28:11.940 --> 28:14.220 this year and it continues marching . 28:14.230 --> 28:16.397 How many hours have been put into it ? 28:16.590 --> 28:18.812 I don't have that number off the top of 28:18.812 --> 28:20.979 my head , Miss Lord , I would estimate 28:20.979 --> 28:23.910 tens of hours tens of hours by the 28:23.910 --> 28:27.430 government by the government . DCM A 28:27.440 --> 28:29.607 that's doing that for us . Thank you , 28:29.607 --> 28:31.718 Mr Armor . You continue to say you're 28:31.718 --> 28:33.980 negotiating on something that is 28:33.980 --> 28:36.630 clearly established that you have 28:36.640 --> 28:38.880 underperformed . It's been estimated 28:38.880 --> 28:42.700 that $183 million the United States 28:42.700 --> 28:44.644 government , the taxpayers of this 28:44.644 --> 28:48.640 country are paying 75% of 28:48.650 --> 28:51.880 your budget and your profits . 28:52.540 --> 28:54.990 I want to know when you're gonna pay 28:54.990 --> 28:58.090 the $183 million stopped nickel and 28:58.090 --> 29:00.201 dime ing the United States government 29:00.201 --> 29:01.312 and the taxpayers . 29:03.640 --> 29:05.990 Congressman Azzawi , you've identified 29:05.990 --> 29:07.879 in this testimony That number has 29:07.879 --> 29:10.710 changed from 303 to 183 which is a new 29:10.710 --> 29:13.870 number to me today . So I think we have 29:13.880 --> 29:15.991 due diligence to do amongst ourselves 29:15.991 --> 29:17.940 relative to the contributors that 29:17.940 --> 29:19.996 influence the issues associated with 29:19.996 --> 29:22.107 electronic heels . We know that it is 29:22.107 --> 29:24.384 not right . So I have very little time . 29:24.470 --> 29:26.650 How much time are you going to take 29:26.660 --> 29:28.882 before we're gonna have an answer as to 29:28.882 --> 29:30.993 whether or not you're gonna repay the 29:30.993 --> 29:33.300 government ? Congressman , we continue 29:33.300 --> 29:35.411 to negotiate in good faith across the 29:35.411 --> 29:37.960 table . Right ? Let me let me more . Um , 29:40.340 --> 29:42.507 are we absolutely committed to doing , 29:42.730 --> 29:46.690 um , Odeon Oden ? 29:46.870 --> 29:49.210 Yes . Absolutely . We have the dates 29:49.210 --> 29:51.266 rolling out right now . We'll have . 29:51.266 --> 29:53.043 All right , let me ask you this 29:53.043 --> 29:55.154 question . As I calculated it , if we 29:55.154 --> 29:57.266 continue to just do work arounds over 29:57.266 --> 29:59.680 the course of the next 66 years , it 29:59.680 --> 30:02.770 would cost us $3.6 billion to just do 30:02.770 --> 30:06.190 work arounds with the existing Alice 30:06.190 --> 30:08.650 system . Are we gonna end up paying 30:08.650 --> 30:12.550 mawr for Oden than $3.6 billion ? 30:13.440 --> 30:16.790 What ? We are developing Oden so that 30:16.790 --> 30:18.901 we don't have to do work around where 30:18.901 --> 30:20.846 you I understand up . And so we're 30:20.846 --> 30:22.901 doing it for the same amount that we 30:22.901 --> 30:25.123 had budgeted just for Baseline Dallas . 30:25.290 --> 30:28.640 So how much is it going to cost time ? 30:28.650 --> 30:31.540 There's $547 million across 21 through 30:31.540 --> 30:34.190 25 in the budget associated with Oden . 30:34.370 --> 30:36.600 I'm sorry associated with with Oden . 30:36.830 --> 30:39.052 We believe there's also on the order of 30:39.052 --> 30:42.130 about $70 million a year between now on 30:42.130 --> 30:44.270 day 2022 that we will continue to put 30:44.280 --> 30:47.570 into Dallas who is going toe own the 30:47.580 --> 30:49.747 intellectual property U S government . 30:50.140 --> 30:52.670 No question , no question . And that 30:52.670 --> 30:56.040 will then allow us to have others fix 30:56.040 --> 30:58.520 it . So we're not negotiating with the 30:58.520 --> 31:02.520 prime contractor over easily . $183 31:02.520 --> 31:05.120 million when we pay Ah , half a 31:05.120 --> 31:07.430 $1,000,000,000 for every plane we 31:07.430 --> 31:09.740 purchased from them . I would like to 31:09.740 --> 31:12.190 say to Mr Omer , you are not a good 31:12.190 --> 31:14.180 actor in this . This is just one 31:14.180 --> 31:16.800 component . We already know that there 31:16.810 --> 31:20.610 are nine flaws on the F 35 that are 31:20.610 --> 31:24.500 identified as critical as 31:24.750 --> 31:27.330 priority ones that , to my knowledge , 31:27.330 --> 31:29.400 have still not been addressed . So 31:29.410 --> 31:31.632 we're looking at one component of the F 31:31.632 --> 31:33.710 35 . We've had lots of problems . Of 31:33.720 --> 31:36.100 the F 35 we've had problems with the 31:36.100 --> 31:39.080 seats . We got problems with the oxygen 31:39.080 --> 31:41.780 system and for you not come to the 31:41.780 --> 31:44.480 table and negotiate this 100 A $3 31:44.480 --> 31:47.670 million really aggravates me and should 31:47.680 --> 31:49.513 aggravate every taxpayer in this 31:49.513 --> 31:52.850 country . Owning this system outright 31:52.850 --> 31:55.490 should have been the case initially and 31:55.490 --> 31:57.860 we wouldn't be in this situation . And 31:57.870 --> 31:59.981 for all those that think that somehow 31:59.981 --> 32:02.203 the F 35 is the safest playing around . 32:03.180 --> 32:05.180 I've got news for you . We have had 32:05.180 --> 32:07.430 problems with this plane and we 32:07.430 --> 32:09.430 continue to have problems with this 32:09.430 --> 32:12.550 plane , and we should be very concerned 32:12.550 --> 32:16.260 about these eel system not being 32:16.270 --> 32:18.750 accurate because it draws that whole 32:18.760 --> 32:20.760 issue into question without a yield 32:20.760 --> 32:24.020 back . I thank the gentle lady for her 32:24.020 --> 32:26.780 passion and knowledge on this issue , 32:27.260 --> 32:29.940 and now would like Teoh call on 32:29.940 --> 32:32.580 Congressman heist . Congressman Hice . 32:33.810 --> 32:36.032 Thank you , madam . Here . I think it's 32:36.032 --> 32:39.550 important that we state that the end 32:39.550 --> 32:41.661 result is we want to see this program 32:41.661 --> 32:43.950 succeed . And the purpose of oversight 32:44.440 --> 32:48.020 is to ultimately get to that end on . 32:48.020 --> 32:51.220 And there are some glimpse in the road 32:51.220 --> 32:53.442 here , so to speak . We need to address 32:53.442 --> 32:55.664 those issues , but we want to thank you 32:55.664 --> 32:57.553 for your work and acknowledge the 32:57.553 --> 33:00.020 purpose of oversight is to get some of 33:00.020 --> 33:02.187 these issues resolved . So I just want 33:02.187 --> 33:04.353 that on record . Let me ask you , Miss 33:04.353 --> 33:08.180 Lord , within that context , a 33:08.180 --> 33:10.347 lot of the argument is that we need to 33:10.347 --> 33:13.120 see Lockheed write a check on 33:14.310 --> 33:15.850 Go from that perspective . 33:16.030 --> 33:18.308 Unfortunately , if that were to happen , 33:18.308 --> 33:20.086 the check just ends up going to 33:20.086 --> 33:21.974 Treasury and it does not help the 33:21.974 --> 33:24.030 program . It doesn't help anything . 33:24.030 --> 33:26.141 Are there other forms of compensation 33:26.210 --> 33:28.080 that might be more beneficial ? 33:28.540 --> 33:31.980 Absolutely . We're now negotiating the 33:31.990 --> 33:35.100 next annual sustainment contract and 33:35.100 --> 33:37.930 the two year options . After that , we 33:37.930 --> 33:40.097 could very well look for consideration 33:40.097 --> 33:43.460 in that contract . Okay , so there are 33:43.460 --> 33:45.627 other options here , and I think those 33:45.627 --> 33:47.849 other options need to be on the table . 33:47.849 --> 33:49.904 They need to be considered . I would 33:49.904 --> 33:52.127 also . I do have another concern that I 33:52.127 --> 33:55.850 want to bring up for RG Hole and 33:56.460 --> 33:58.780 let me just say as I understand this , 33:58.780 --> 34:02.750 we've got about 353 of these jets that 34:02.750 --> 34:06.050 have been built out of out of about 500 34:06.320 --> 34:09.430 since 2015 and yet 34:10.420 --> 34:12.642 ballpark of a trillion dollars has been 34:12.642 --> 34:14.753 spent on operations and sustainment . 34:14.753 --> 34:16.976 Now I just did a little math that comes 34:16.976 --> 34:20.780 to $566 million per plane 34:21.300 --> 34:24.150 per year . That is a staggering amount 34:24.150 --> 34:26.039 to me if we're talking a trillion 34:26.039 --> 34:29.050 dollars in five years for these planes , 34:29.540 --> 34:33.230 Um , again , that's just my math . But 34:33.230 --> 34:35.710 let's can I get some clarification on 34:35.710 --> 34:38.650 it ? So we're gonna have to go back and 34:38.660 --> 34:40.771 help help you with the math . I don't 34:40.771 --> 34:43.370 understand where the , uh , trillion 34:43.370 --> 34:45.481 dollars over the last five year quote 34:45.481 --> 34:47.481 came from . I don't understand that 34:47.481 --> 34:49.481 number . The most recent life cycle 34:49.481 --> 34:51.592 cost estimate for the entirety of the 34:51.592 --> 34:53.814 program over 60 years is 1.6 trillion . 34:53.814 --> 34:55.870 So I find it hard to believe that we 34:55.870 --> 34:57.926 spent a trillion dollars in the last 34:57.926 --> 35:00.259 five where that figure is out . In fact , 35:00.259 --> 35:02.930 the selected acquisition report 35:02.930 --> 35:05.620 actually didn't . I don't recall seeing 35:05.620 --> 35:09.050 that number , but they did say that the 35:09.060 --> 35:11.360 amount of spending now going per year 35:11.360 --> 35:14.480 per plane is going to strange future 35:14.480 --> 35:16.830 service , operation and sustainment . I 35:16.830 --> 35:19.210 mean , so whatever the actual cost is , 35:19.210 --> 35:22.760 this is une enormously expensive 35:22.870 --> 35:25.870 program here on , So I want to know 35:25.870 --> 35:29.000 kind of how does the annual onus calls 35:29.600 --> 35:31.767 compared to other fighter jet programs 35:31.767 --> 35:35.090 in the past ? So I can't speak 35:35.090 --> 35:37.257 specifically to the onus cost of other 35:37.257 --> 35:39.479 fighters had programs . But I know that 35:39.479 --> 35:41.534 we're aggressively targeting getting 35:41.534 --> 35:44.000 our when its costs to $25,000 per 35:44.000 --> 35:46.680 flight hour by F Y . 25 . That's our 35:46.690 --> 35:49.620 That is a that is a stretch goal that 35:49.620 --> 35:51.787 I'm work . So are we . Are we training 35:51.787 --> 35:54.064 in that direction or retraining ? Teoh , 35:54.064 --> 35:56.398 Call savings . We are what we're making . 35:56.398 --> 35:58.509 We're making deliberate progress . To 35:58.509 --> 36:02.160 get to 25 by 25 will be a huge if you 36:02.160 --> 36:04.216 could will revise some comparison of 36:04.216 --> 36:06.470 past programs to where we are now as 36:06.470 --> 36:08.526 well as the goal . Goals are great , 36:08.526 --> 36:10.692 but I don't know it with the trends to 36:10.692 --> 36:12.803 get to those goals . Excuse me . That 36:12.803 --> 36:14.914 should approach the fourth generation 36:14.914 --> 36:16.914 stained costs . That was the way we 36:16.914 --> 36:19.940 derived the target of $25,000 per 36:19.940 --> 36:22.330 flight hour . Okay , I would like if 36:22.330 --> 36:24.497 you could provide that to me . I would 36:24.497 --> 36:26.719 appreciate that . Miss Lord , let me go 36:26.719 --> 36:28.274 with you . And I appreciate 36:28.274 --> 36:30.386 conversations we've had in the past . 36:30.386 --> 36:33.040 We've got problems with the Alice 36:33.430 --> 36:37.290 the system transfer to the Odin 36:37.290 --> 36:39.123 system . Can you kind of walk us 36:39.123 --> 36:41.960 through some of the expectations of of 36:41.970 --> 36:44.960 Odin and how this is going toe play out . 36:45.140 --> 36:47.540 Absolutely . First of all , Odin is 36:47.540 --> 36:50.540 going to be deployed on much more 36:50.540 --> 36:53.130 modern hardware . So , for instance , 36:53.140 --> 36:55.500 the Alice system . Today , for one 36:55.500 --> 36:59.040 system you have about £891 of hardware 36:59.200 --> 37:01.311 for Odin . You're going toe only have 37:01.311 --> 37:03.220 about £50 of hardware . So the 37:03.230 --> 37:05.563 footprints very different . And in fact , 37:05.563 --> 37:08.000 as we move towards the first deployment 37:08.010 --> 37:11.790 of Oden in September 2021 an interim 37:11.790 --> 37:14.410 step is this fault . Actually . Move 37:14.420 --> 37:16.700 Alice onto the new hardware as the 37:16.710 --> 37:19.610 first step we will own all of the data 37:19.610 --> 37:21.760 writes in the government . For Oden 37:21.770 --> 37:24.270 versus Alice , it is going to be 37:24.270 --> 37:26.650 deployed in the cloud . It is being 37:26.650 --> 37:29.530 developed using requirements in large 37:29.530 --> 37:32.050 part from the actual maintainers . So , 37:32.050 --> 37:34.290 for instance , I was on the phone 37:34.290 --> 37:37.120 yesterday with the maintenance unit , 37:37.130 --> 37:39.970 leads at five different locations , 37:40.090 --> 37:42.470 making sure that their voice had been 37:42.480 --> 37:45.310 heard by the actual team doing the 37:45.310 --> 37:48.370 coding for Oden . We also as opposed to 37:48.370 --> 37:51.730 using the old waterfall software 37:51.730 --> 37:53.910 development tack techniques . We're 37:53.910 --> 37:57.330 using agile and def sec ops to do that . 37:57.330 --> 37:59.950 So we are in essence coding every night . 38:00.010 --> 38:01.980 I'm sorry , coating every day and 38:01.980 --> 38:04.900 testing every night . We have delivery 38:04.900 --> 38:07.210 bals from the team , the government and 38:07.220 --> 38:10.170 industry team every single day , so we 38:10.170 --> 38:12.300 can measure those deliverables and we 38:12.300 --> 38:14.411 can measure them against the baseline 38:14.411 --> 38:16.189 requirements . So a very , very 38:16.189 --> 38:18.810 different system than Alice is . Okay . 38:18.810 --> 38:20.866 Thank you , Madam Chair , I'll yield 38:20.866 --> 38:23.790 back . But I do want to just say Teoh , 38:24.030 --> 38:26.030 Mr . Pick , I didn't have some more 38:26.030 --> 38:28.197 questions . Particularly that I'd like 38:28.197 --> 38:30.720 to get some answers for specific to 38:31.010 --> 38:33.200 modified training . That we're seeing 38:33.200 --> 38:35.540 it Hill and Luke Air Force Base is and 38:35.540 --> 38:37.762 why that's happening . So I'll get with 38:37.762 --> 38:39.762 you later on that . But thank you , 38:39.762 --> 38:41.818 Madam Chair , are you Absolutely . I 38:41.818 --> 38:43.929 thank the gentleman and now recognize 38:43.929 --> 38:45.873 representative Wasserman Schultz . 38:46.620 --> 38:49.680 Thank you , Madam Chair . I want toe 38:50.270 --> 38:54.150 ask my questions through a fiscal 38:54.150 --> 38:56.030 lens at the senior member of the 38:56.040 --> 38:58.180 Appropriations Committee because I'm 38:58.190 --> 39:01.530 deeply concerned about what I'm hearing 39:01.540 --> 39:04.030 and seeing the waste in this management 39:04.030 --> 39:07.750 of federal dollars is really paramount 39:07.760 --> 39:09.649 here . There have to be oversight 39:09.649 --> 39:11.704 mechanisms in place to keep costs in 39:11.704 --> 39:13.871 check as D o . D . And Lockheed Martin 39:13.871 --> 39:15.927 and we're going forward on replacing 39:15.927 --> 39:18.149 Alice , which is actually held the main 39:18.149 --> 39:20.427 at 35 software system . So , Miss Lord , 39:20.427 --> 39:23.620 in 2016 the Defense Department told G a . 39:23.620 --> 39:25.564 O that the Alice Stock West system 39:25.564 --> 39:27.780 would cost an estimated $17 billion . 39:28.150 --> 39:30.940 And Geo found that estimate quote not 39:30.950 --> 39:33.117 really credible , since the department 39:33.117 --> 39:35.283 hadn't formed a full analysis of these 39:35.283 --> 39:37.470 costs . What is the ODIs ? Current 39:37.470 --> 39:39.470 estimate of how much money has been 39:39.470 --> 39:42.870 spent on Alice ? We're spending on 39:42.880 --> 39:45.650 on Oden the same amount that we're 39:45.650 --> 39:48.170 spending on Alice . And if you give me 39:48.170 --> 39:51.950 a moment here , I have the amount over 39:51.950 --> 39:55.260 the next five years . 547 million for 39:55.260 --> 39:58.450 the next five years . But the 39:58.460 --> 39:59.320 lieutenant of 40:05.810 --> 40:08.320 what has already didn't spend on Alex 40:08.410 --> 40:10.920 I'm not Afghani broke . Lost some car . 40:13.450 --> 40:15.617 We don't have that right here , but we 40:15.617 --> 40:17.561 can certainly get that to you very 40:17.561 --> 40:21.060 shortly . Okay , suffice it to say , 40:21.500 --> 40:24.130 is it more than $17 million ? 40:27.100 --> 40:29.580 I don't believe so . That seems like a 40:29.580 --> 40:31.802 very large number , but we can get that 40:31.802 --> 40:35.060 for your short . Respectfully . That 40:35.070 --> 40:37.290 left the amount that that the Defense 40:37.290 --> 40:39.600 Department told Geo that the Alice 40:39.600 --> 40:41.760 software system would cost , and that 40:41.760 --> 40:43.820 was deemed not really incredible . 40:43.830 --> 40:45.552 because the department had not 40:45.552 --> 40:47.552 performed the full analysis . So my 40:47.552 --> 40:49.663 suspicion is that it's cost more than 40:49.663 --> 40:51.330 that already , and now you're 40:51.330 --> 40:53.590 projecting another $547 billion . 40:53.950 --> 40:56.420 Earlier this month , on July 10 the 40:56.420 --> 40:58.309 department announced it would pay 40:58.309 --> 41:00.531 Lockheed Martin 87 a half $1,000,000 to 41:00.531 --> 41:02.600 begin the development with Odin and 41:02.600 --> 41:05.190 start the transition from Alice . What 41:05.190 --> 41:07.270 will I want to ask you ? A series of 41:07.280 --> 41:09.690 questions at once . And then you answer 41:09.690 --> 41:12.360 those . What will that initial work by 41:12.580 --> 41:15.190 blocking Martin include , And the 87 a 41:15.200 --> 41:17.700 half $1,000,000 contract transition 41:17.700 --> 41:20.033 from Alice is really only the beginning . 41:20.250 --> 41:23.510 You expect I would imagine Odin cost a 41:23.510 --> 41:25.621 lot more than that . You just said it 41:25.621 --> 41:27.788 would be $547 million . And since this 41:27.788 --> 41:29.788 program has had crossed significant 41:29.788 --> 41:32.040 cost overruns in the past , how do you 41:32.040 --> 41:34.151 plan to ensure that the costs of Odin 41:34.151 --> 41:37.970 is not excesses ? The 41:37.970 --> 41:41.050 way Odin is being contract ID for is 41:41.050 --> 41:43.300 very different than what we've done in 41:43.300 --> 41:45.530 the past were actually defining the 41:45.530 --> 41:48.810 architecture and releasing app by app . 41:48.860 --> 41:51.670 We just released the first contract to 41:51.670 --> 41:55.640 Lockheed Martin in July and the work is 41:55.640 --> 41:58.300 actually being done in a government 41:58.310 --> 42:01.710 owned cloud environment . On we have 42:01.710 --> 42:04.330 total visibility toe what is delivered 42:04.330 --> 42:08.280 every day . Okay , if I can ask you to 42:08.280 --> 42:10.058 pause for a moment , my initial 42:10.058 --> 42:12.169 question was the 87 a half $1,000,000 42:12.169 --> 42:14.336 contract transition from Alice is just 42:14.336 --> 42:16.520 the beginning . You expected to cost 42:16.530 --> 42:19.310 more than that ? Go to . And what will 42:19.520 --> 42:21.853 the initial work by Lockheed Martin and , 42:23.200 --> 42:25.920 well , we have about 550 million over 42:25.920 --> 42:29.010 the next five years . And the initial 42:29.010 --> 42:32.520 work is a series of codings done by app . 42:32.530 --> 42:34.363 But I'm gonna pass to login it , 42:34.363 --> 42:36.363 Lieutenant General Thick . For more 42:36.363 --> 42:38.363 specifics , man , that's accurate . 42:38.363 --> 42:40.474 Lockheed Martin will be coating three 42:40.474 --> 42:43.460 specific applications in four . Odin on 42:43.460 --> 42:45.571 This is the early work associate with 42:45.571 --> 42:49.490 those APS . General , do you think the 42:49.490 --> 42:51.657 D . O . D should move forward with any 42:51.657 --> 42:53.823 of the design plan without knowing how 42:53.823 --> 42:55.990 much the plan or any component of that 42:55.990 --> 42:56.990 friend cost 43:00.090 --> 43:02.270 man ? My team continues to refine the 43:02.270 --> 43:05.020 cost estimate for Alice and Odin moving 43:05.020 --> 43:08.090 forward . The $547 million was money 43:08.090 --> 43:09.868 that had been pretty previously 43:09.868 --> 43:11.979 allocated to an Alice Re architecture 43:11.979 --> 43:14.090 effort . We believe that we can fully 43:14.140 --> 43:16.540 in Stan . She ate Oden over the course 43:16.540 --> 43:18.484 of the next five years within that 43:18.484 --> 43:20.596 budgetary cap . But we know that over 43:20.596 --> 43:22.818 the course of the 50 years remaining in 43:22.818 --> 43:24.984 the program that to remain viable , we 43:24.984 --> 43:27.020 will need to continue to update the 43:27.020 --> 43:29.390 software as issues were found as the 43:29.390 --> 43:31.390 program evolves and its maintenance 43:31.390 --> 43:33.501 practices change . So I do anticipate 43:33.501 --> 43:35.668 more funds will be required beyond the 43:35.668 --> 43:38.640 fighting . Dios , March 2020 report 43:38.640 --> 43:40.320 recommended that his Lord and 43:40.320 --> 43:42.650 consultation with you general develop a 43:42.650 --> 43:45.790 detailed strategy this more , um , any 43:45.790 --> 43:49.120 comments on my question about 43:49.410 --> 43:52.960 the uncertainty that is looming on on 43:52.960 --> 43:54.904 how much this is going to cost the 43:54.904 --> 43:56.980 redesign of Alice that includes the 43:56.980 --> 43:59.147 cost of redesigning the whole system ? 43:59.740 --> 44:03.600 Well , we plan to have Odin deployed 44:03.760 --> 44:07.540 fully by December . I'm sorry . The 44:07.540 --> 44:09.600 question has been is more Oh , 44:11.490 --> 44:14.950 thank you . Yes , we way . Share your 44:14.950 --> 44:17.120 concern about the ability to tread a . 44:17.250 --> 44:19.700 The overall approach on the strategy 44:19.700 --> 44:21.867 for implementing over in this world is 44:21.867 --> 44:24.210 a cost associated with that . Uh oh . 44:24.210 --> 44:26.154 It is a relatively new initiatives 44:26.154 --> 44:28.377 designed replaced something that's been 44:28.377 --> 44:30.488 around for almost two years . They're 44:30.488 --> 44:32.654 going to be significant challenges and 44:32.654 --> 44:32.500 significant costs associated with doing 44:32.500 --> 44:34.556 that . And it's important that it be 44:34.556 --> 44:36.778 done right and be done in . And it cost 44:36.778 --> 44:39.111 effectively . Thank you , madam . Chair , 44:39.111 --> 44:41.940 you back the balance of my time . Thank 44:41.940 --> 44:44.630 the lady for her questions and we now 44:44.630 --> 44:46.290 represent now . Recognize 44:46.290 --> 44:47.690 Representative Norman . 44:50.980 --> 44:54.420 Thank you , Madam Chairman . Inspector 44:54.430 --> 44:57.830 Hole . In your testimony , you stated 44:57.830 --> 45:00.190 the quote . While a missing ill does 45:00.190 --> 45:02.301 not mean a part is defective , it can 45:02.301 --> 45:04.310 create life and safety concerns for 45:04.310 --> 45:07.450 aircrews . Yes , you also state that 45:07.460 --> 45:09.450 quote the D . O D's use of local 45:09.450 --> 45:11.910 guidance and and hot manual processes 45:12.290 --> 45:14.850 allow aircraft flying complete missions 45:14.860 --> 45:16.916 instead of the deal de grounding the 45:16.916 --> 45:19.170 aircraft . This suggested me that if 45:19.170 --> 45:20.980 anyone put lives at risk gives 45:20.980 --> 45:23.370 individuals at the d . O d . Not 45:23.370 --> 45:26.010 Lockheed Martin . Is this your opinion ? 45:27.590 --> 45:30.460 The staff , the maintainers and the 45:30.470 --> 45:32.414 commanders at the depot had a very 45:32.414 --> 45:34.637 difficult decision . They either had to 45:34.637 --> 45:36.859 conduct a work around to get parts onto 45:36.859 --> 45:38.859 the aircraft so they could continue 45:38.859 --> 45:41.081 their training and operational missions 45:41.081 --> 45:43.081 or they had to quarantine apart and 45:43.081 --> 45:45.303 potentially impact that ability . So we 45:45.303 --> 45:49.080 although you said earlier that for two 45:49.080 --> 45:51.880 quality and safety we were aware of 45:51.880 --> 45:55.240 apart . That was a seat survival kit 45:55.250 --> 45:58.820 assembly that was the is a critical 45:58.820 --> 46:02.020 safety item that was flown on and 46:02.020 --> 46:04.131 tracked through manual processes such 46:04.131 --> 46:07.530 as a whiteboard . Thank you . General 46:07.530 --> 46:10.660 fig deals pose a safety 46:11.070 --> 46:13.720 concern or is it a risk ? In your 46:13.720 --> 46:17.630 opinion ? So , in my 46:17.630 --> 46:19.060 opinion , um , 46:24.050 --> 46:26.850 it the answer is it depends . There are 46:26.850 --> 46:29.072 some parts that are safety critical and 46:29.072 --> 46:31.294 our life limited . And those parts have 46:31.294 --> 46:34.220 eels , and those eels must be in place 46:34.220 --> 46:36.280 for that part to be installed on 46:36.280 --> 46:38.502 aircraft . So in those cases , yes , it 46:38.502 --> 46:41.350 is safety critical for other parts who 46:41.350 --> 46:43.430 also have eels . This parts are not 46:43.430 --> 46:45.486 safety critical . And this parts are 46:45.486 --> 46:47.486 not life limited . It's those parts 46:47.486 --> 46:49.708 were actually looking at to try to find 46:49.708 --> 46:51.874 a way to remove the requirement for an 46:51.874 --> 46:54.041 eel so that this discussion of deal or 46:54.041 --> 46:57.360 no wheel comes off the table . Does 46:57.360 --> 46:59.460 that make sense ? Can you give an 46:59.460 --> 47:02.700 example of a part that demonstrate what 47:02.700 --> 47:05.270 you're talking about ? I don't have a 47:05.270 --> 47:07.860 specific part , number or nomenclature 47:08.650 --> 47:12.120 for you , but I know that a czar right 47:12.120 --> 47:14.287 now we're looking at eliminating close 47:14.287 --> 47:17.320 to 600 of them across the airplane that 47:17.320 --> 47:19.630 have heels . But they're not safety 47:19.630 --> 47:21.908 critical . Nor they life limited parts . 47:21.908 --> 47:24.720 So of the 1000 roughly 600 . Okay , so 47:24.720 --> 47:27.880 it is a distinction . Yes , sir , Miss 47:27.880 --> 47:30.620 Lord . And I guess General Pickles . 47:30.620 --> 47:33.310 Well , how quickly will we get the ode 47:33.310 --> 47:35.630 ei and operational ? And what is the 47:35.630 --> 47:38.450 estimated calls to develop and deploy 47:38.520 --> 47:42.070 the D I A n ? So the initial delivery 47:42.070 --> 47:45.520 of the system is targeted for Sept 2021 . 47:45.730 --> 47:49.330 And to develop it will be several 47:49.330 --> 47:51.386 $100 million over the next couple of 47:51.386 --> 47:55.260 years and then a couple $100 million 47:55.270 --> 47:58.040 for the few years after that to 47:58.050 --> 48:01.670 continue that deployment . Yeah , 48:02.000 --> 48:04.690 General . So we intend to declare what 48:04.690 --> 48:06.968 we call initial operational capability , 48:06.968 --> 48:09.190 which is the capability at one squadron 48:09.370 --> 48:12.660 in September of 2021 by by December of 48:12.660 --> 48:15.510 2022 . Our intent is to have Odin 48:15.510 --> 48:17.920 spread across the entire fleet with the 48:17.920 --> 48:19.809 exception of units that might not 48:19.809 --> 48:21.864 decide to transition because they're 48:21.880 --> 48:24.060 currently deployed or otherwise . Need 48:24.060 --> 48:26.060 to continue to use the legacy Alice 48:26.060 --> 48:28.060 system . We'll get those as soon as 48:28.060 --> 48:30.430 operational constraints allow . Thank 48:30.430 --> 48:32.208 you . The storm Look . What has 48:32.208 --> 48:34.430 Lockheed Martin done to ensure that the 48:34.430 --> 48:37.400 F 35 sustainment meets the warfighter 48:37.400 --> 48:41.250 needs ? Congressman ? There's 48:41.250 --> 48:44.080 several avenues relative to sustainment . 48:44.090 --> 48:46.423 Eso we have been working on reliability , 48:46.423 --> 48:48.590 maintain ability , improvements on the 48:48.590 --> 48:50.423 platform . We've been working to 48:50.423 --> 48:52.646 improve the prognostic system on the on 48:52.646 --> 48:54.812 the platform . We have gone advance of 48:54.812 --> 48:56.646 contract requirements to procure 48:56.646 --> 48:58.646 material to ensure that we have the 48:58.646 --> 49:00.646 spare parts when the customer needs 49:00.646 --> 49:02.590 them . There's a several different 49:02.590 --> 49:04.701 aspects We've been working to improve 49:04.701 --> 49:07.250 the Alice system . Eso There's many 49:07.250 --> 49:09.417 different levers across the enterprise 49:09.417 --> 49:11.530 that we apply to improve sustainment 49:11.530 --> 49:14.970 performance on that 35 . Well , thank 49:14.970 --> 49:17.110 you . Think like Congressman Heist 49:17.120 --> 49:19.990 mentioned that the what we need to be 49:19.990 --> 49:22.790 doing is looking at the to solve the 49:22.790 --> 49:26.410 issue . No question about the money has 49:26.410 --> 49:29.020 come up to be paid back , but also the 49:29.020 --> 49:31.187 question , in fact , that that doesn't 49:31.187 --> 49:33.660 solve any problems . Lucky Martin does 49:33.660 --> 49:35.716 a great job of producing airplanes , 49:35.970 --> 49:37.970 and I think we'll continue to , and 49:37.970 --> 49:40.137 we're trying to find any problems that 49:40.137 --> 49:42.170 exist . You all trying to find a 49:42.510 --> 49:46.170 solution to him ? Um , amount of time 49:46.180 --> 49:50.180 you back . Thank you , gentlemen . And 49:50.180 --> 49:52.640 now recognize a Congress person . 49:52.640 --> 49:56.450 Stupid is on 49:56.450 --> 49:57.310 line . Okay , 50:00.860 --> 50:03.140 He was online . Congressman , are you 50:03.150 --> 50:07.010 with us ? We're going to 50:07.010 --> 50:09.840 go to Congress Member Keller as we wait 50:09.840 --> 50:12.010 for Mr Steuby . Okay . Congress Member 50:12.010 --> 50:15.190 Keller . Thank you , Madam Chair . And 50:15.200 --> 50:17.680 I would like to think the Panelists for 50:17.680 --> 50:19.680 being here today or the witnesses a 50:19.680 --> 50:21.680 couple questions that I had , but I 50:21.680 --> 50:23.569 want to sort of follow up on some 50:23.569 --> 50:25.402 questions that my colleague from 50:25.402 --> 50:27.513 Georgia was asking regarding the cost 50:27.513 --> 50:30.700 per hour off flight . Our is that you 50:30.700 --> 50:34.130 say by 2025 we want to get to $25,000 50:34.130 --> 50:37.310 per flight hour . So we consider that a 50:37.310 --> 50:39.570 stretch goal yesterday . What is the 50:39.570 --> 50:43.130 current cost ? I believe current cost 50:43.130 --> 50:45.300 replied hours on the order of $35,000 50:45.330 --> 50:48.490 later . Okay . And so there's a 50:48.500 --> 50:52.050 schedule each year to get to that . So 50:52.050 --> 50:54.272 I mentioned in my opening comments that 50:54.272 --> 50:56.439 we've really We've pivoted the program 50:56.439 --> 50:58.606 office into lines of effort associated 50:58.606 --> 51:02.360 with five different divisions 51:02.920 --> 51:04.930 to include the air vehicle , the 51:04.930 --> 51:07.152 engines , the maintenance systems , the 51:07.152 --> 51:09.374 comment , data systems and the training 51:09.374 --> 51:11.486 systems . I've allocated cost savings 51:11.486 --> 51:13.541 targets to each one of those offices 51:13.541 --> 51:15.763 that they need to pursue to get to that 51:15.763 --> 51:17.763 overall cost per flying hour . Call 51:17.820 --> 51:20.300 Andi . When did we start this school or 51:20.300 --> 51:22.133 what was school established ? We 51:22.133 --> 51:24.244 started to begin work on it . So that 51:24.244 --> 51:26.820 25 by 25 goal first , I think it's the 51:27.310 --> 51:29.254 hit the program office . About two 51:29.254 --> 51:31.477 years ago , we started to talk about it 51:31.477 --> 51:33.254 on and move the program in that 51:33.254 --> 51:35.477 direction , looking holistically across 51:35.477 --> 51:37.400 a number of initiatives from 51:37.410 --> 51:39.132 principally from a sustainment 51:39.132 --> 51:41.132 perspective but also respecting the 51:41.132 --> 51:42.966 fact that development influences 51:42.966 --> 51:45.132 sustainment costs as well , looking at 51:45.132 --> 51:47.299 those opportunities . So two years ago 51:47.299 --> 51:49.410 was it at $35,000 a flight ? Our What 51:49.410 --> 51:51.632 was it when you started ? It was it was 51:51.632 --> 51:53.688 higher . I don't know the number off 51:53.688 --> 51:53.500 the top of my head , so we don't know 51:53.500 --> 51:55.611 what we gained . Or could we find out 51:55.611 --> 51:57.611 what we gain ever two years to make 51:57.611 --> 51:59.833 sure we're on track of him . Strangle , 51:59.833 --> 52:01.944 I realize , is a stretch goal , but I 52:01.944 --> 52:01.910 think it's important to know where we 52:01.910 --> 52:03.910 are . Yes , so if we could get that 52:03.910 --> 52:06.310 information and appreciate it , the 52:06.320 --> 52:08.487 other thing I wanted to sort of follow 52:08.487 --> 52:10.800 up on we all know that it's important , 52:10.800 --> 52:12.744 important program and looking what 52:12.744 --> 52:14.911 we're doing . But I want to go back to 52:14.911 --> 52:16.800 the eels and we know there's been 52:16.800 --> 52:18.911 reported issues , and I guess this is 52:18.911 --> 52:21.133 before Miss Lord , there's a you know , 52:21.133 --> 52:23.244 issues associated with the electronic 52:23.390 --> 52:25.780 equipment logs and some of the data 52:25.790 --> 52:28.110 inaccuracies is due to human interface , 52:28.120 --> 52:30.920 and you know some of those items and we 52:30.920 --> 52:33.360 know that's gonna happen no matter what 52:33.360 --> 52:35.527 you're doing , when you're when you're 52:35.527 --> 52:37.416 dealing with that , are there any 52:37.416 --> 52:39.471 strategies that have been identified 52:39.471 --> 52:41.638 that might help cut down on the manual 52:41.638 --> 52:43.804 in putting of data so that there might 52:43.804 --> 52:45.860 be accuracy any kind of reducing the 52:45.860 --> 52:47.916 human interface ? Absolutely . There 52:47.916 --> 52:50.260 are two different pieces to that . One 52:50.270 --> 52:53.430 is Alice has been relatively user 52:53.440 --> 52:55.580 unfriendly , a lot of training to get 52:55.730 --> 52:57.952 to be able to learn how to use it . Our 52:57.952 --> 53:00.490 latest release helps that significantly , 53:00.610 --> 53:03.940 however , in Odin , what we're doing is 53:03.940 --> 53:06.162 making sure it's much more automated in 53:06.162 --> 53:08.860 terms of data feeds and also prompting 53:08.860 --> 53:11.850 the user input . So those two things 53:11.850 --> 53:14.110 should be very helpful , and that 53:14.120 --> 53:16.560 that's Experian gonna be having this 53:16.570 --> 53:18.570 totally implemented , or is there a 53:18.570 --> 53:20.681 phase in and that we can see how this 53:20.681 --> 53:22.903 is working . How soon do you anticipate 53:22.903 --> 53:24.903 being ableto to see the benefits of 53:24.903 --> 53:27.160 this ? We will have the first system 53:27.160 --> 53:30.480 deployed in September of 2021 . A lot 53:30.480 --> 53:33.010 of testing will go on before that point 53:33.010 --> 53:34.750 in time . And then it will be 53:34.750 --> 53:36.990 throughout the fleet by December of 53:37.000 --> 53:40.140 2022 except for units that might be 53:40.140 --> 53:42.140 deployed on aircraft carriers , for 53:42.140 --> 53:44.307 instance , or in very remote , austere 53:44.307 --> 53:47.550 areas . Okay , Uh , also , there's been 53:47.550 --> 53:50.750 a lot of talk about different things , 53:50.750 --> 53:52.750 but can you speak to actions ? That 53:52.750 --> 53:54.694 department is taken in response to 53:54.694 --> 53:57.580 Section 1 92 of the fiscal 2020 and D A . 53:57.690 --> 53:59.801 Related to the relief from failure to 53:59.801 --> 54:02.490 deliver ready for issue spare ports ? 54:02.820 --> 54:05.210 Absolutely . What we have done is put a 54:05.210 --> 54:07.730 whole team together to look at that . 54:07.740 --> 54:09.730 We've worked with the contractor . 54:09.800 --> 54:12.130 We've really gone to bet back to look 54:12.130 --> 54:14.241 at what's the root cause ? What's the 54:14.241 --> 54:16.186 fundamental issue ? And we believe 54:16.186 --> 54:18.408 Although there are many , many issues , 54:18.408 --> 54:20.574 it fundamentally comes down to Alice , 54:20.574 --> 54:22.910 and that's part of what has really 54:22.910 --> 54:25.180 incentivized us to accelerate to the 54:25.180 --> 54:27.347 Odin transition . Okay , so when we're 54:27.347 --> 54:29.569 talking about Alice and the issues were 54:29.569 --> 54:31.513 having have these been issues that 54:31.513 --> 54:33.624 we've experienced since the beginning 54:33.624 --> 54:35.569 of the implementation of the Alice 54:35.569 --> 54:39.040 program ? Yes . So ? So over time , we 54:39.040 --> 54:42.240 should When we when we look at moving 54:42.240 --> 54:44.129 away from that , we should not be 54:44.129 --> 54:46.240 repeating the same the same issues or 54:46.240 --> 54:48.184 no , we should not . And in fact , 54:48.184 --> 54:50.240 there actually have been large gains 54:50.240 --> 54:52.129 made with Alice . There have been 54:52.129 --> 54:54.296 multiple releases , and if you talk to 54:54.296 --> 54:56.462 the maintenance units , they will tell 54:56.462 --> 54:59.440 you that particularly 3.5 dot two that 54:59.450 --> 55:01.880 we just put out has made a lot of 55:01.890 --> 55:04.020 difference . But still , it's not a 55:04.020 --> 55:06.131 streamlined as it could be . It's not 55:06.131 --> 55:08.570 as easy to use . So when did we begin 55:08.570 --> 55:10.348 using Alice ? If I can ask that 55:10.348 --> 55:13.000 question , Oden will start in 2021 . We 55:13.000 --> 55:15.800 have an updated version off Alice that 55:15.800 --> 55:17.911 just went out about a month ago . But 55:17.911 --> 55:19.911 when did the department start using 55:19.911 --> 55:23.800 Alice back in 2012 ? I defer to 55:23.800 --> 55:27.090 the Prior to that . Earlier I said 55:27.090 --> 55:29.360 2006 . I'll confirm , sir , for 55:29.360 --> 55:31.138 reference when we started out , 55:31.138 --> 55:33.360 actually operationally using . I'm just 55:33.360 --> 55:35.304 years . I'm just sort of cures out 55:35.304 --> 55:37.670 quickly weaken implement procedures . 55:37.670 --> 55:39.892 And if it's taken us this long , I want 55:39.892 --> 55:41.892 to make sure that when we go over , 55:41.892 --> 55:43.948 though , you know when we transition 55:43.948 --> 55:43.730 over that it doesn't take us that 55:43.740 --> 55:45.962 period of time . So that would actually 55:45.962 --> 55:48.184 have the benefit in this case with Odin 55:48.184 --> 55:50.351 of understanding what we don't like on 55:50.351 --> 55:53.130 and using that to build what we do . So , 55:53.130 --> 55:55.241 as the team collects metrics from the 55:55.241 --> 55:57.352 users associated with the performance 55:57.352 --> 55:59.519 of Alice were using that to inform the 55:59.519 --> 56:01.630 capability needs statement associated 56:01.630 --> 56:03.630 with owed . And so we have a better 56:03.630 --> 56:05.408 idea to the point that was made 56:05.408 --> 56:07.408 previously . Of what ? Of what good 56:07.408 --> 56:09.630 looks like and what we really need Odin 56:09.630 --> 56:11.741 to look like from a maintainers and a 56:11.741 --> 56:11.740 warfighters perspective . And we're 56:11.740 --> 56:13.796 driving that train this time . We're 56:13.796 --> 56:16.018 not leaving it up to somebody else . So 56:16.018 --> 56:18.073 in other words , we've we've learned 56:18.073 --> 56:18.070 from our past history of things we've 56:18.070 --> 56:20.237 done inappropriately to make sure that 56:20.237 --> 56:22.570 we don't repeat the same failures . Yes , 56:22.570 --> 56:25.610 sir . Thank you for your back . Thank 56:25.620 --> 56:28.050 thank you very much . I now recognize 56:28.050 --> 56:31.820 Representative Talib and she is remote 56:33.780 --> 56:36.280 with us . Thank you . So great I am . 56:36.280 --> 56:38.391 Can you hear me , OK ? Yes , we can . 56:39.120 --> 56:41.342 Oh , thank you , Chairwoman . Thank you 56:41.342 --> 56:43.453 for allowing me to serve my residents 56:43.453 --> 56:45.610 in the state environments on . I just 56:45.610 --> 56:48.210 want to appreciate everyone being 56:48.210 --> 56:50.510 available to us . I know , and I 56:50.510 --> 56:52.732 apologize that some of this was asked , 56:52.732 --> 56:54.732 but I think it's really important , 56:54.732 --> 56:56.788 especially these are things that I'm 56:56.788 --> 56:58.899 hearing from my community . But Onley 56:58.899 --> 57:01.066 About two days ago , the House adopted 57:01.066 --> 57:03.232 my amendment to the N D . A focused on 57:03.232 --> 57:05.177 care for two crew members who have 57:05.177 --> 57:07.450 experienced unexplained psychological 57:07.450 --> 57:10.550 episodes while operating F 35 . So , 57:10.550 --> 57:13.260 Lieutenant of Think , do you know 57:13.270 --> 57:15.103 what's causing the psychological 57:15.103 --> 57:16.992 episodes ? And again , if you had 57:16.992 --> 57:18.826 answer . But I think it's really 57:18.826 --> 57:21.103 important for folks to understand that . 57:21.103 --> 57:21.060 And then the second question . What has 57:21.530 --> 57:23.641 Department of Defense done to protect 57:23.641 --> 57:25.808 the service members from some of these 57:25.808 --> 57:27.920 safety issues ? So we're working very 57:27.920 --> 57:30.087 closely with the services and with the 57:30.087 --> 57:32.190 medical community to understand each 57:32.190 --> 57:34.134 and every one of the physiological 57:34.134 --> 57:37.150 events that that occurs 57:37.390 --> 57:39.400 we have seen over the course of the 57:39.400 --> 57:41.344 last three years . I think I would 57:41.344 --> 57:43.890 characterize as a decrease in the 57:43.890 --> 57:46.280 occurrence of P E within the F 35 57:46.280 --> 57:48.730 enterprise . But to say there is a 57:48.730 --> 57:51.560 common root cause between all of them . 57:51.680 --> 57:54.840 I think , um , I don't think that we've 57:54.840 --> 57:58.270 come to that to that conclusion at this 57:58.270 --> 58:02.260 time . More more work to go , Miss 58:02.260 --> 58:04.370 Lord , as we know they have 35 58:04.370 --> 58:06.620 sustained a sustainment contracts 58:06.620 --> 58:08.610 included a clause that said the 58:08.610 --> 58:10.721 government may require the contractor 58:10.721 --> 58:12.721 to replace her correct any supplies 58:12.721 --> 58:14.888 that are non conforming at the time of 58:14.888 --> 58:17.450 delivery . So Miss Lord problems with 58:17.450 --> 58:19.394 the electronic logs This is really 58:19.394 --> 58:21.506 important here can happen through the 58:21.506 --> 58:24.680 life cycle of a part . Correct ? Yes . 58:24.690 --> 58:26.579 And that's why we need to look at 58:26.579 --> 58:28.523 contract language and make sure it 58:28.523 --> 58:30.690 reflects the experience that we've had 58:30.710 --> 58:33.420 so that , as you point out at the time 58:33.420 --> 58:36.680 of delivery , is not the entirety of 58:36.680 --> 58:38.569 the time it goes through the eels 58:38.569 --> 58:41.340 system . We have to recognize that well , 58:41.340 --> 58:43.173 if a problem developed following 58:43.173 --> 58:45.396 delivery , would it be even be possible 58:45.396 --> 58:47.396 for Department of Defense to reject 58:47.396 --> 58:49.451 that spare part ? Or would deal ? Do 58:49.451 --> 58:51.673 you need to keep that part and wait for 58:51.673 --> 58:53.896 lock heads Martin personnel to fix it ? 58:54.520 --> 58:57.720 We have ongoing discussions about those 58:57.720 --> 58:59.970 kinds of issues that if it's after the 58:59.970 --> 59:02.137 point at which we initially accepted , 59:02.360 --> 59:06.330 that becomes more complicated . Well , 59:06.330 --> 59:08.780 in order to be cleared for flight at 35 59:08.780 --> 59:11.050 policy states that an aircraft must be 59:11.050 --> 59:13.620 Elektronik Lee complete quote complete 59:13.630 --> 59:16.570 in Alice , meaning that all the 59:16.570 --> 59:18.737 electronic records from each installed 59:18.737 --> 59:20.959 at 35 part must be functioning in Alice 59:21.420 --> 59:24.800 when a part missing its Elektronik log 59:24.940 --> 59:27.107 Alice signals that the aircraft should 59:27.107 --> 59:29.730 be grounded according to Joint Program 59:29.730 --> 59:31.841 office officials quote . This is what 59:31.841 --> 59:34.960 they said . On any given day , over 50% 59:34.970 --> 59:38.440 of the F 35 fleet is flying with non R 59:38.440 --> 59:40.860 F I spare parts . Do you find that 59:40.860 --> 59:44.320 concerning Miss Lord ? I have 59:44.330 --> 59:47.870 faith in our maintenance unit leaders 59:47.880 --> 59:51.290 who look at each part and determine 59:51.290 --> 59:54.540 whether the aircraft is fit to fly 59:54.550 --> 59:56.840 there , well versed in safety and would 59:56.840 --> 01:00:00.100 never make any safety compromises . All 01:00:00.100 --> 01:00:02.156 of that being said , I have faith in 01:00:02.156 --> 01:00:04.350 all of our maintainers . I would like 01:00:04.360 --> 01:00:07.240 our systems to be 100% correct and 01:00:07.240 --> 01:00:09.910 effective . You know what I think the 01:00:09.920 --> 01:00:11.864 American public would agree . Miss 01:00:11.864 --> 01:00:13.960 Mauer . In March , the G L reported 01:00:13.960 --> 01:00:17.070 that it is common for of 35 supply with 01:00:17.070 --> 01:00:19.590 over 20 inaccurate or missing 01:00:19.590 --> 01:00:21.757 electronic records . Even though Alice 01:00:21.757 --> 01:00:23.646 signals that the planes should be 01:00:23.646 --> 01:00:25.701 grounded , so was more briefly . How 01:00:25.701 --> 01:00:27.812 can service members be 100% sure that 01:00:27.812 --> 01:00:29.701 Alice Cygnus are due to defective 01:00:29.701 --> 01:00:31.701 Elektronik logs and not potentially 01:00:31.701 --> 01:00:35.210 dangerous issue within the aircraft ? I 01:00:35.210 --> 01:00:39.040 think that I think what we'll find is 01:00:39.040 --> 01:00:41.430 when we talk to soaps maintainers on on 01:00:41.430 --> 01:00:43.541 the flight line of work on that air . 01:00:43.541 --> 01:00:45.597 Probable fine line Is that there ? I 01:00:45.597 --> 01:00:47.652 agree with Undersecretary Lord um Is 01:00:47.652 --> 01:00:49.819 there doing their level best to ensure 01:00:49.819 --> 01:00:52.041 that the plane but the plane is safe to 01:00:52.041 --> 01:00:54.208 fly ? Having said that when the system 01:00:54.208 --> 01:00:56.041 that was hundreds of millions of 01:00:56.041 --> 01:00:57.930 dollars to develop and boy that's 01:00:57.930 --> 01:01:00.041 designed to help them with the system 01:01:00.041 --> 01:01:02.263 But playing congealing on the fly isn't 01:01:02.263 --> 01:01:04.486 trusted , that's the problem is they're 01:01:04.486 --> 01:01:06.597 using . These cuff records were using 01:01:06.597 --> 01:01:08.819 spreadsheets . It injects another level 01:01:08.819 --> 01:01:10.763 of risk into those decisions . And 01:01:10.763 --> 01:01:12.986 that's where the many reasons why Alice 01:01:12.986 --> 01:01:15.152 needs to be temper well , I think it s 01:01:15.152 --> 01:01:17.152 so essentially our pilots are being 01:01:17.152 --> 01:01:19.208 forced to fly . Aircraft had neither 01:01:19.208 --> 01:01:21.152 the D , o . D . Or Lockheed Martin 01:01:21.152 --> 01:01:23.319 Convey verify 100% state do you know , 01:01:23.319 --> 01:01:25.597 like trying to clog problems and Alice , 01:01:25.597 --> 01:01:27.763 coupled with potential for human error 01:01:27.763 --> 01:01:27.180 and work around the tracking ? I I 01:01:27.180 --> 01:01:29.580 simply think it's outrageous that after 01:01:29.590 --> 01:01:31.423 spending millions of dollars and 01:01:31.423 --> 01:01:33.646 thousands of hours of manpower that our 01:01:33.646 --> 01:01:35.701 pilots are still being asked to risk 01:01:35.701 --> 01:01:37.812 their lives because of malfunctioning 01:01:37.812 --> 01:01:39.868 equipment . So in case anything here 01:01:39.868 --> 01:01:41.812 wasn't clear . Thanks . This Now I 01:01:41.812 --> 01:01:44.034 think my chairwoman were agree . Before 01:01:44.034 --> 01:01:46.201 you have blood on your hands , I think 01:01:46.201 --> 01:01:45.630 it's really important that you have 01:01:45.640 --> 01:01:48.410 actual lives . Human beings are behind 01:01:48.410 --> 01:01:50.577 these . Like that we have . We're it's 01:01:50.577 --> 01:01:52.799 our responsibility to make sure they're 01:01:52.799 --> 01:01:55.077 safe . And so , with that , I yield um , 01:01:55.077 --> 01:01:57.021 the rest of my time . Chairwoman . 01:01:57.021 --> 01:01:59.132 Thank you so much . Thank Thank you . 01:01:59.132 --> 01:02:00.910 So very much for your important 01:02:00.910 --> 01:02:02.743 observations . I'd now like Teoh 01:02:02.743 --> 01:02:04.466 recognize Congressman Steuby . 01:02:04.466 --> 01:02:06.521 Congressman Steuby . See , hear . Or 01:02:06.521 --> 01:02:09.960 online . Great . Thank you . 01:02:11.770 --> 01:02:14.310 Mr Omer . First get like to give you 01:02:14.310 --> 01:02:16.660 the opportunity to respond . Teoh What 01:02:16.670 --> 01:02:19.920 Mrs to leave just said as a regards to 01:02:19.930 --> 01:02:21.430 the safety of the aircraft 01:02:23.850 --> 01:02:26.150 Congressman , as we mentioned the parts 01:02:26.150 --> 01:02:28.317 or not of concern it is the Elektronik 01:02:28.317 --> 01:02:31.240 file associated with the part . So we 01:02:31.240 --> 01:02:32.907 have processes in place . The 01:02:32.907 --> 01:02:34.907 maintainers have processes in place 01:02:34.907 --> 01:02:36.940 relative to part integrity . We are 01:02:36.940 --> 01:02:39.450 delivered . Each part is delivered dd 2 01:02:39.450 --> 01:02:41.840 50 It goes through a formal inspection 01:02:41.840 --> 01:02:43.850 process . Relative to that , the 01:02:43.850 --> 01:02:46.200 aircraft also has diagnostic systems on 01:02:46.200 --> 01:02:48.740 board relative to the health of the 01:02:48.740 --> 01:02:50.462 platform itself once parts are 01:02:50.462 --> 01:02:52.600 installed , so there's several layers 01:02:52.610 --> 01:02:54.390 of protection relative to part 01:02:54.390 --> 01:02:58.150 integrity . Can Laki 01:02:58.150 --> 01:03:00.620 Martin Arrow solved the eels 01:03:00.620 --> 01:03:02.676 functionality and data issues on its 01:03:02.676 --> 01:03:05.750 own ? Or is that a broader issue ? It 01:03:05.750 --> 01:03:07.972 needs to be done as an enterprise , and 01:03:07.972 --> 01:03:10.028 I think we collectively have engaged 01:03:10.028 --> 01:03:11.917 that issue relative to We need to 01:03:11.917 --> 01:03:14.139 listen to the warfighter , how they how 01:03:14.139 --> 01:03:16.361 they operate , sustain and maintain the 01:03:16.361 --> 01:03:18.528 aircraft . We need to incorporate that 01:03:18.528 --> 01:03:20.194 that information that learned 01:03:20.194 --> 01:03:21.750 information relative to the 01:03:21.750 --> 01:03:23.861 implementation within Alice and as we 01:03:23.861 --> 01:03:26.083 go forward into Odin system so it those 01:03:26.083 --> 01:03:28.250 requirements need to be defined by the 01:03:28.250 --> 01:03:30.472 user , and then industry and government 01:03:30.472 --> 01:03:32.639 needs to understand that requirement , 01:03:32.639 --> 01:03:34.694 and then we can We can work to solve 01:03:34.694 --> 01:03:36.750 that problem . We will be able to do 01:03:36.750 --> 01:03:40.310 that . The F 35 program has been 01:03:40.310 --> 01:03:42.532 referred to as a concurrent development 01:03:42.540 --> 01:03:44.207 program . How does concurrent 01:03:44.207 --> 01:03:46.151 development affect the sustainment 01:03:46.151 --> 01:03:50.130 portion of the program . So as the 01:03:50.130 --> 01:03:52.310 as the products been developed , we 01:03:52.310 --> 01:03:54.830 have also begun production . So in the 01:03:54.840 --> 01:03:56.507 early phases of the program , 01:03:56.507 --> 01:03:58.673 development was ongoing while we still 01:03:58.673 --> 01:04:01.060 produce the aircraft . Just two years 01:04:01.060 --> 01:04:03.116 ago , we received what's called full 01:04:03.116 --> 01:04:05.171 warfighter capability with a three f 01:04:05.171 --> 01:04:07.720 capability eso as that capability was 01:04:07.720 --> 01:04:10.210 released . The fleet has grown 01:04:10.390 --> 01:04:12.930 approximately 300 aircraft in the last 01:04:12.930 --> 01:04:15.610 three years , so there's been a lot of 01:04:15.620 --> 01:04:17.787 planning of how we plan to sustain the 01:04:17.787 --> 01:04:19.731 aircraft and now there is a lot of 01:04:19.731 --> 01:04:21.842 learning as we actually implement and 01:04:21.842 --> 01:04:24.009 sustain the airplane in the fleet . We 01:04:24.009 --> 01:04:25.898 then take and apply that learning 01:04:25.898 --> 01:04:27.898 relative to the experience that has 01:04:27.898 --> 01:04:29.620 occurred and update the system 01:04:29.620 --> 01:04:31.731 accordingly , and we seen significant 01:04:31.731 --> 01:04:33.731 improvement . I make comments in my 01:04:33.731 --> 01:04:35.950 testament in my opening remarks . The 01:04:35.960 --> 01:04:38.210 sustainment from a mission capable rate 01:04:38.210 --> 01:04:40.210 in the last two years has increased 01:04:40.210 --> 01:04:43.070 from the low fifties to the mid 70 01:04:43.070 --> 01:04:44.959 percentile from a mission capable 01:04:44.959 --> 01:04:46.959 release , and we also see the other 01:04:46.959 --> 01:04:49.126 sustainment metrics in terms of health 01:04:49.126 --> 01:04:51.181 of supply and maintenance activities 01:04:51.181 --> 01:04:53.348 also significantly improved . So we we 01:04:53.348 --> 01:04:55.570 can measure our performance at a system 01:04:55.570 --> 01:04:57.570 level relative to how the system is 01:04:57.570 --> 01:05:00.910 improving general thick . Can you , 01:05:00.920 --> 01:05:03.770 um , how do you feel about our pilots 01:05:03.770 --> 01:05:07.730 being safe and slime that 45 ? So 01:05:07.730 --> 01:05:09.952 I have full faith and confidence in our 01:05:09.952 --> 01:05:12.008 maintenance group commanders and the 01:05:12.008 --> 01:05:14.119 troops that they come in and giving a 01:05:14.119 --> 01:05:16.341 ready for flight aircraft to our to our 01:05:16.341 --> 01:05:18.397 aircraft . I mentioned in my opening 01:05:18.397 --> 01:05:20.619 remarks . I have a son who's flying for 01:05:20.619 --> 01:05:22.786 the Air Force . He doesn't fly F 35 to 01:05:22.786 --> 01:05:24.786 his dismay , but but I know that he 01:05:24.786 --> 01:05:27.330 trusts his maintainers implicitly and 01:05:27.330 --> 01:05:29.260 explicitly to deliver to him an 01:05:29.260 --> 01:05:31.482 aircraft . It's safe to fly . I believe 01:05:31.482 --> 01:05:33.149 that as the maintenance group 01:05:33.149 --> 01:05:35.450 commanders assess the parts that are 01:05:35.450 --> 01:05:37.506 put onto the aircraft there , making 01:05:37.506 --> 01:05:39.561 sure that any aircraft they clear to 01:05:39.561 --> 01:05:40.660 fly is safe to fly 01:05:43.380 --> 01:05:45.602 General , can you please provide to the 01:05:45.602 --> 01:05:47.769 committee an overview of how the after 01:05:47.769 --> 01:05:49.824 thoughtless performing when I played 01:05:49.824 --> 01:05:51.936 and talked to the capabilities of the 01:05:51.936 --> 01:05:51.810 aircraft is providing for the men and 01:05:51.810 --> 01:05:54.990 women in uniform ? So it was 1/5 01:05:54.990 --> 01:05:57.046 generation strike fighter platform . 01:05:57.046 --> 01:05:59.870 The F 35 relies upon stealth sensor 01:05:59.870 --> 01:06:02.170 fusion and interoperability to allow it 01:06:02.180 --> 01:06:05.320 to penetrate and persist and to punish 01:06:05.630 --> 01:06:07.797 in a way that no other air system eyes 01:06:07.797 --> 01:06:10.019 capable of doing today . I think if you 01:06:10.019 --> 01:06:12.130 talk to a war fighter who flies the F 01:06:12.130 --> 01:06:14.241 35 Operations Aaron training , you'll 01:06:14.241 --> 01:06:16.241 find that they're very , very happy 01:06:16.241 --> 01:06:18.297 with the plane . They're very , very 01:06:18.297 --> 01:06:20.574 happy with the system that they've got . 01:06:20.574 --> 01:06:22.741 They always want more , and we need to 01:06:22.741 --> 01:06:24.852 give them war because the threats not 01:06:24.852 --> 01:06:24.630 slowing down the threats , not stopping . 01:06:24.840 --> 01:06:27.062 We need to continue to move the program 01:06:27.062 --> 01:06:29.340 forward from a development perspective , 01:06:29.340 --> 01:06:31.507 from a production perspective and from 01:06:31.507 --> 01:06:34.630 the sustainment perspective . And what 01:06:34.630 --> 01:06:36.797 do you think can be done to take on to 01:06:36.797 --> 01:06:38.908 ensure that the F 35 is ready to take 01:06:38.908 --> 01:06:42.600 on emerging threats ? So , sir , we're , 01:06:42.610 --> 01:06:45.290 uh , deliberately moving the program 01:06:45.300 --> 01:06:48.190 into a new paradigm for development 01:06:48.200 --> 01:06:50.367 that you may have heard of referred to 01:06:50.367 --> 01:06:52.533 is continuous capability , development 01:06:52.533 --> 01:06:54.700 and delivery working to transition , a 01:06:54.700 --> 01:06:57.500 legacy departmental . Our legacy 01:06:57.500 --> 01:07:00.070 industry style of development and 01:07:00.080 --> 01:07:03.060 delivery in huge traunch is into a more 01:07:03.060 --> 01:07:05.282 incremental and agile focus development 01:07:05.282 --> 01:07:07.504 paradigm where we bring capabilities to 01:07:07.504 --> 01:07:09.671 the warfighters faster that's gonna be 01:07:09.671 --> 01:07:11.893 important as we work our way forward on 01:07:11.893 --> 01:07:13.838 the threat continues to change our 01:07:13.838 --> 01:07:15.893 ability to be agile or not . Overuse 01:07:15.893 --> 01:07:18.080 that word to be nimble on the things 01:07:18.080 --> 01:07:20.302 that we can do with and on the platform 01:07:20.302 --> 01:07:24.220 will be critical . My time has expired . 01:07:24.220 --> 01:07:26.387 Thank you , General . For your service 01:07:26.387 --> 01:07:30.060 or country . Yeah . The chair now 01:07:30.060 --> 01:07:32.000 recognizes Congresswoman Porter . 01:07:34.480 --> 01:07:37.830 Hello , Mr Omar . Does Lucky 01:07:37.840 --> 01:07:41.180 Martin owe the government money ? The 01:07:41.190 --> 01:07:42.579 federal government money 01:07:45.270 --> 01:07:47.270 congresswoman were negotiating that 01:07:47.270 --> 01:07:49.492 today with the defense Contact Contract 01:07:49.492 --> 01:07:51.381 Management Agency Relative to the 01:07:51.381 --> 01:07:53.659 issues associated with Elektronik eels . 01:07:54.680 --> 01:07:56.680 You're negotiating today . How much 01:07:56.680 --> 01:07:58.990 does Lockheed Martin O taxpayers , 01:08:00.560 --> 01:08:02.782 Carson . We're going through that . The 01:08:02.782 --> 01:08:05.010 figures that were provided 303 million 01:08:05.010 --> 01:08:07.850 have been reduced . 183 I heard today . 01:08:08.270 --> 01:08:10.381 So I think we're collectively working 01:08:10.381 --> 01:08:12.548 to understand , from an accountability 01:08:12.548 --> 01:08:14.714 point of view what those numbers are . 01:08:14.714 --> 01:08:16.603 Why were the figures produced the 01:08:16.603 --> 01:08:18.930 federal government that the F 35 01:08:18.940 --> 01:08:21.540 defective parts cost the government 01:08:21.550 --> 01:08:24.870 $300 million ? Why is that about being 01:08:24.870 --> 01:08:28.050 reduced ? I don't know the specifics , 01:08:28.050 --> 01:08:30.272 man , but I do know that the government 01:08:30.500 --> 01:08:32.722 to reduce the amount you owe them or is 01:08:32.722 --> 01:08:35.970 it lucky Martin's idea came from the 01:08:35.980 --> 01:08:37.647 government ? It came from the 01:08:37.647 --> 01:08:40.540 government . Okay , Then I'll ask Miss 01:08:40.540 --> 01:08:43.800 Lord about this in a minute . So you're 01:08:43.800 --> 01:08:47.340 negotiating over what ? Waas 300 ? $250 01:08:47.340 --> 01:08:49.673 million . But it's somehow been reduced . 01:08:49.810 --> 01:08:53.660 Teoh . About half that . How is locking 01:08:53.670 --> 01:08:57.580 doing financially ? Man , we 01:08:57.580 --> 01:08:59.990 just released our quarterly earnings 01:08:59.990 --> 01:09:03.750 yesterday . So net sales , 01:09:03.750 --> 01:09:07.750 16.2 billion net earnings , 1.6 billion 01:09:07.750 --> 01:09:10.760 in our cash , 2.2 billion . Okay , I 01:09:10.760 --> 01:09:12.760 want to make sure I have this right 01:09:13.310 --> 01:09:15.532 from that quarterly investor call which 01:09:15.532 --> 01:09:18.690 we also listen to . Profit is up 15% 01:09:19.010 --> 01:09:21.260 over this time last year . More than 01:09:21.260 --> 01:09:25.120 3.5 billion in profit so far in 2020 01:09:25.290 --> 01:09:28.830 10 times . That $3.5 billion in profit 01:09:28.850 --> 01:09:31.200 is 10 times what you owe the taxpayers . 01:09:31.470 --> 01:09:33.650 One recent headline . I hope you saw 01:09:33.650 --> 01:09:35.817 this good publicity for your company . 01:09:35.817 --> 01:09:37.817 One recent headline called Lockheed 01:09:37.817 --> 01:09:41.040 Martin Up Endemic Star for your ability 01:09:41.040 --> 01:09:43.470 to be earning money even as taxpayers 01:09:43.530 --> 01:09:45.252 at everyday families and small 01:09:45.252 --> 01:09:47.760 businesses struggle . So I'm not sure 01:09:47.760 --> 01:09:49.704 why the noticed that reduced . I'm 01:09:49.704 --> 01:09:51.871 gonna ask Miss Ford about that , but I 01:09:51.871 --> 01:09:53.816 also want to know more about why , 01:09:53.816 --> 01:09:56.780 given that Lucky is a pandemic stopper , 01:09:57.270 --> 01:09:59.437 Lucky is writing a letter to the white 01:09:59.437 --> 01:10:01.603 House just wrote a letter to the White 01:10:01.603 --> 01:10:04.330 House asking taxpayers to give lacking 01:10:04.340 --> 01:10:05.700 bailout funds . 01:10:08.310 --> 01:10:10.032 I'm not aware of that letter , 01:10:10.032 --> 01:10:13.200 congresswoman . So you're telling me 01:10:13.210 --> 01:10:15.321 that it is lucky . Murray's statement 01:10:15.321 --> 01:10:17.900 on the record that there is no request 01:10:17.930 --> 01:10:21.350 for additional money related to things 01:10:21.350 --> 01:10:23.910 like the ministry lending program or 01:10:23.910 --> 01:10:25.980 than money set aside , specifically 01:10:26.090 --> 01:10:28.312 cares for national security companies . 01:10:29.360 --> 01:10:31.249 Man , I'm not aware of a specific 01:10:31.249 --> 01:10:33.471 letter . I am aware relative to Cove It 01:10:33.471 --> 01:10:36.740 19 and cares act relative to the 01:10:36.740 --> 01:10:39.880 disruption to aerospace and defense . I 01:10:39.890 --> 01:10:42.168 don't know the specifics of the letter . 01:10:42.168 --> 01:10:44.112 You're mentioning them . Did Lucky 01:10:44.112 --> 01:10:46.260 Martin request money under the Cares 01:10:46.260 --> 01:10:50.020 Act ? Yes , ma'am . Why ? 01:10:51.560 --> 01:10:53.616 Because of the disruption associated 01:10:53.616 --> 01:10:57.130 with Kobe 19 because of the disruption 01:10:57.130 --> 01:11:00.930 that caused you to have a profit of 15% 01:11:00.940 --> 01:11:03.162 over the prior year when we didn't have 01:11:03.162 --> 01:11:05.970 covered 19 ? That doesn't mean maybe 01:11:05.970 --> 01:11:08.230 making gobs of money is disruption for 01:11:08.230 --> 01:11:10.230 you . But I think for most everyday 01:11:10.230 --> 01:11:12.341 Americans , if they'd seen her income 01:11:12.341 --> 01:11:15.010 go up 15% this year , if they were 01:11:15.360 --> 01:11:17.720 making 10 if they were making a 30 01:11:18.020 --> 01:11:20.187 through my $1,000,000,000 in profit in 01:11:20.187 --> 01:11:21.910 2020 they wouldn't call that a 01:11:21.910 --> 01:11:24.430 disruption . They call that a miracle , 01:11:24.510 --> 01:11:26.510 and they would not be coming to the 01:11:26.510 --> 01:11:28.732 government trying to take more taxpayer 01:11:28.732 --> 01:11:30.843 dollars at the same time that you are 01:11:30.843 --> 01:11:32.910 failing to pay the U . S . Taxpayers 01:11:32.910 --> 01:11:34.990 back what you owe for breach of 01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:38.510 contract with regard to the F 35 Joint 01:11:38.510 --> 01:11:42.110 Strike Force , I am unable to 01:11:42.110 --> 01:11:44.332 understand why you need this additional 01:11:44.332 --> 01:11:47.390 money when your profits are up and you 01:11:47.390 --> 01:11:49.501 breached our contracts with regard to 01:11:49.501 --> 01:11:51.668 producing defective parts . Why should 01:11:51.668 --> 01:11:53.612 the taxpayer foot the bill to help 01:11:53.612 --> 01:11:56.960 Lucky Martin at this time ? Man ? 01:11:56.960 --> 01:12:00.020 The disruption associated with Kobe 19 01:12:00.030 --> 01:12:02.210 requires many different aspects . 01:12:02.210 --> 01:12:04.640 Relative Teoh , health and welfare of 01:12:04.640 --> 01:12:07.120 employees . The suppliers 01:12:07.850 --> 01:12:11.070 with use your 01:12:11.070 --> 01:12:15.060 15% increase in profit to pay 01:12:15.190 --> 01:12:17.620 to protect your workers during Kobe . 01:12:22.670 --> 01:12:24.830 Putting the bill to help a company 01:12:24.830 --> 01:12:27.150 that's having an uber profitability 01:12:27.150 --> 01:12:28.970 moment that is a pandemic star 01:12:29.850 --> 01:12:31.794 congresswoman . No funds have been 01:12:31.794 --> 01:12:34.017 provided relative to the cares Act that 01:12:34.017 --> 01:12:37.750 you have . Yes , just like meaning 01:12:37.750 --> 01:12:40.480 aerospace and defense companies . One 01:12:40.480 --> 01:12:42.647 wrong doesn't make a right With that , 01:12:42.647 --> 01:12:45.860 I yield back . The gentle lady yields 01:12:45.860 --> 01:12:48.760 back and , uh , I now record recognize 01:12:48.760 --> 01:12:50.260 represented growth Hman . 01:12:53.680 --> 01:12:55.860 This whole will start with you . Your 01:12:55.860 --> 01:12:58.230 report found that is the result of 01:12:58.230 --> 01:13:00.286 receiving that Ready for issue spare 01:13:00.286 --> 01:13:02.452 parts . The Department of Defense been 01:13:02.452 --> 01:13:05.070 303 million labor costs since 2000 and 01:13:05.070 --> 01:13:07.940 15 . If that figures Right , that's 01:13:07.940 --> 01:13:10.107 kind of a big number . Can you explain 01:13:10.107 --> 01:13:13.230 how you arrived at that number ? The 01:13:13.240 --> 01:13:16.170 303 million is just the cost of vot 01:13:16.170 --> 01:13:19.730 labor . So it it costs about 7000 to 01:13:19.730 --> 01:13:23.200 11,000 her issue to fix or to resolve . 01:13:23.420 --> 01:13:26.160 So that figure is just for the labour 01:13:26.280 --> 01:13:28.336 attributed to the action requests at 01:13:28.336 --> 01:13:30.280 the time . So it's really a larger 01:13:30.280 --> 01:13:32.630 number and cost overall . Yes , it only 01:13:32.630 --> 01:13:34.797 reflects duty labor . It does not take 01:13:34.797 --> 01:13:37.019 into account the additional amount that 01:13:37.019 --> 01:13:39.241 Lockheed charged back to the government 01:13:39.241 --> 01:13:41.463 to get the parts that , you know , back 01:13:41.463 --> 01:13:43.297 ready for issue so much That was 01:13:43.297 --> 01:13:45.408 unfortunately because of the way data 01:13:45.408 --> 01:13:47.574 was not tracked regarding that we were 01:13:47.574 --> 01:13:49.574 unable to obtain that information . 01:13:49.650 --> 01:13:51.970 Okay . Are you trying to get it ? Are 01:13:52.550 --> 01:13:54.717 They're just what ? I can give you the 01:13:54.717 --> 01:13:56.790 information or we requested the 01:13:56.790 --> 01:13:59.012 information from Lockheed Martin during 01:13:59.012 --> 01:14:01.179 the course of the audit , but they did 01:14:01.179 --> 01:14:03.012 not provide it . Do you have any 01:14:03.012 --> 01:14:05.290 recourse , or you just gotta tolerated . 01:14:05.880 --> 01:14:08.190 Lockheed Martin shared with our audit 01:14:08.190 --> 01:14:10.250 team that they do not track the 01:14:10.250 --> 01:14:12.361 information in a manner in which they 01:14:12.361 --> 01:14:14.770 could provide that cost to us . Heller . 01:14:15.540 --> 01:14:18.710 I guess they're saving costs , huh ? Um , 01:14:19.130 --> 01:14:21.160 in the years since report has been 01:14:21.160 --> 01:14:22.993 released , have you continued to 01:14:22.993 --> 01:14:25.650 monitor the delivery of non verify 01:14:25.650 --> 01:14:29.250 parts ? Since our issue are since our 01:14:29.250 --> 01:14:31.290 report was issued , we're currently 01:14:31.290 --> 01:14:33.346 tracking the recommendations that we 01:14:33.346 --> 01:14:35.568 made to the joint program office on the 01:14:35.568 --> 01:14:37.568 joint proud program office . Agreed 01:14:37.568 --> 01:14:39.734 with all four recommendations . And we 01:14:39.734 --> 01:14:39.460 are in the process of waiting for 01:14:39.460 --> 01:14:41.510 information to validate the actions 01:14:41.510 --> 01:14:43.732 taken . If you have any update for us , 01:14:43.732 --> 01:14:46.200 just keep waiting . Currently , we're 01:14:46.200 --> 01:14:48.470 waiting for documentation to validate 01:14:48.480 --> 01:14:50.620 actions taken . Okay , we have a 01:14:50.620 --> 01:14:53.250 general think a question here . Uh , 01:14:53.260 --> 01:14:55.371 what's your office than toe address ? 01:14:55.371 --> 01:14:57.538 Their problem and what type of changes 01:14:57.538 --> 01:15:00.980 you think we need is to move forward So 01:15:00.990 --> 01:15:03.500 relative to the eel issue and on r f I 01:15:03.500 --> 01:15:05.444 parts , we have worked very , very 01:15:05.444 --> 01:15:07.667 closely with the field on with Lockheed 01:15:07.667 --> 01:15:10.090 Martin to put process and practice in 01:15:10.090 --> 01:15:13.640 place to to ensure 01:15:13.640 --> 01:15:15.830 that the number of parts that are 01:15:15.830 --> 01:15:19.690 arrive are . But that that requiring , 01:15:19.690 --> 01:15:22.180 er I actually have that he'll One of 01:15:22.180 --> 01:15:24.430 these specific technical moves that 01:15:24.440 --> 01:15:26.910 that the group made was to provide what 01:15:26.910 --> 01:15:28.966 they call in advance shipping notice 01:15:28.966 --> 01:15:32.350 that in some ways significantly reduces 01:15:32.350 --> 01:15:35.010 the errors associated with manual entry 01:15:35.010 --> 01:15:37.121 of data on a part arrives at a base . 01:15:37.121 --> 01:15:39.770 So it effectively pre populates the 01:15:39.770 --> 01:15:41.510 system to allow for an easier 01:15:41.510 --> 01:15:43.880 transmittal of the eel and easier 01:15:43.880 --> 01:15:46.047 acceptance and arrival of that deal on 01:15:46.047 --> 01:15:48.158 the base . That's a large part of the 01:15:48.158 --> 01:15:51.110 reason that we're now in an 83% yield 01:15:51.120 --> 01:15:54.150 horrifying number . Okay , well , can I 01:15:54.150 --> 01:15:57.620 ask a similar question of Mr Omer from 01:15:57.620 --> 01:15:59.731 your perspectives Have had the issues 01:15:59.731 --> 01:16:01.920 that were raised on a narrow in on our 01:16:01.920 --> 01:16:04.870 vice spare parts in the June 2019 . 01:16:04.870 --> 01:16:06.648 Inspector General report Seeing 01:16:06.648 --> 01:16:09.540 improvements ? Yes , sir . They have a 01:16:09.540 --> 01:16:11.818 sui alluded to in the opening comments . 01:16:11.818 --> 01:16:13.970 Ready for issue . Effectiveness rate 01:16:13.970 --> 01:16:16.490 has increased from , I believe , 43% . 01:16:16.860 --> 01:16:20.470 45% to about 83% the last six months . 01:16:21.600 --> 01:16:24.040 Okay , thank you very much . I feel the 01:16:24.050 --> 01:16:27.300 rest of my time gentlemen yields back 01:16:27.300 --> 01:16:28.810 and the chair recognizes a 01:16:28.810 --> 01:16:30.088 Congresswoman Miller . 01:16:34.630 --> 01:16:36.797 Thank you , madam chairman and ranking 01:16:36.797 --> 01:16:38.741 member comer and thank you all for 01:16:38.741 --> 01:16:40.908 being here today to testify before our 01:16:40.908 --> 01:16:43.340 committee . As all of my committee's 01:16:43.340 --> 01:16:45.270 today , understand , all of my 01:16:45.270 --> 01:16:47.690 colleagues today understand the F 35 01:16:47.690 --> 01:16:50.060 program is one of the most essential 01:16:50.060 --> 01:16:52.590 tools in our nation . Armed forces 01:16:52.590 --> 01:16:55.330 disposal . I strongly support the 01:16:55.330 --> 01:16:58.680 continued investment in the F 35 01:16:58.680 --> 01:17:00.840 program , and I believe that it will 01:17:00.840 --> 01:17:02.790 play a major role in defending the 01:17:02.790 --> 01:17:05.040 United States and our allies for 01:17:05.040 --> 01:17:08.340 decades to come . I applaud the work 01:17:08.340 --> 01:17:10.173 that the Department of Defense , 01:17:10.173 --> 01:17:12.620 Lockheed Martin and the thousands of 01:17:12.620 --> 01:17:14.342 suppliers around the country , 01:17:14.390 --> 01:17:16.390 including those in my home state of 01:17:16.390 --> 01:17:18.730 West Virginia , have done to ensure 01:17:18.730 --> 01:17:21.910 that the F 35 program will continue to 01:17:21.910 --> 01:17:24.710 be cost efficient , mission capable and 01:17:24.710 --> 01:17:27.520 effective . I'm encouraged by the 01:17:27.520 --> 01:17:29.187 progress that has been made , 01:17:29.187 --> 01:17:31.960 especially in the last year , to reduce 01:17:31.960 --> 01:17:34.970 the cost per flight and to ensure ready 01:17:34.970 --> 01:17:37.510 for issue Parts compliance are at a 01:17:37.510 --> 01:17:39.880 much higher rate . Again , I want to 01:17:39.890 --> 01:17:42.057 thank you all for being here today for 01:17:42.057 --> 01:17:44.279 questions and showing the Committee and 01:17:44.279 --> 01:17:46.390 the American people the importance of 01:17:46.390 --> 01:17:49.550 the F 35 program . Mr . Omer , 01:17:50.500 --> 01:17:53.400 how has the Corona virus pandemic and 01:17:53.400 --> 01:17:55.730 the shutdown and the sustained economic 01:17:55.730 --> 01:17:58.400 shutdown impacted the supply chain for 01:17:58.400 --> 01:18:00.030 the F 35 program . 01:18:02.170 --> 01:18:05.140 Congresswoman , it's It's a bit of a 01:18:05.140 --> 01:18:07.610 mixed bag , so we have suppliers that 01:18:07.620 --> 01:18:09.740 have shut down for periods of time . 01:18:10.220 --> 01:18:12.900 Think weeks . Think a month . We've had 01:18:12.900 --> 01:18:15.122 suppliers that have had little impact . 01:18:15.122 --> 01:18:16.860 We've had suppliers that their 01:18:16.860 --> 01:18:18.693 workforce has been significantly 01:18:18.693 --> 01:18:21.720 impacted . For example , we've got a 01:18:21.720 --> 01:18:23.553 supplier that have reduced their 01:18:23.553 --> 01:18:26.480 workforce for periods of time from 100% 01:18:26.480 --> 01:18:30.310 down to 20 or 30% . So it has been 01:18:30.320 --> 01:18:32.590 It's been a bit of diverse impact to 01:18:32.590 --> 01:18:34.423 our supply base . We've also had 01:18:34.423 --> 01:18:36.620 suppliers that provide commercial 01:18:36.620 --> 01:18:38.800 material as well as merit military 01:18:39.090 --> 01:18:41.090 hardware to the platform . And so , 01:18:41.090 --> 01:18:43.090 from a commercial aviation point of 01:18:43.090 --> 01:18:45.090 view , they have been significantly 01:18:45.090 --> 01:18:47.312 impacted from a finance health point of 01:18:47.312 --> 01:18:49.170 view . And so there's just many 01:18:49.170 --> 01:18:51.520 different aspects of how Cove it has 01:18:51.520 --> 01:18:53.740 impacted the supply base in industry 01:18:53.740 --> 01:18:55.796 across there , not the aerospace and 01:18:55.796 --> 01:18:58.740 defense sector . Thank you , General 01:18:58.740 --> 01:19:01.500 sick . How does the mission capable 01:19:01.500 --> 01:19:04.510 rate for the F 35 fighters , compared 01:19:04.510 --> 01:19:07.240 to a year ago or even six months ago ? 01:19:09.110 --> 01:19:11.277 I am the mission capable rate of the F 01:19:11.277 --> 01:19:13.443 35 over the course . The last year has 01:19:13.443 --> 01:19:15.554 come up from , as I recall in the mid 01:19:15.554 --> 01:19:18.210 fifties to the low to mid seventies at 01:19:18.270 --> 01:19:21.660 a Zai look back at the data today . It 01:19:21.660 --> 01:19:23.771 actually seems relatively flat in the 01:19:23.771 --> 01:19:26.940 mid seventies Ato fleet level below the 01:19:26.940 --> 01:19:29.107 fleet level as we look individually at 01:19:29.107 --> 01:19:31.162 the F 35 A , which is doing a little 01:19:31.162 --> 01:19:33.218 bit better and the B in the See what 01:19:33.218 --> 01:19:35.440 you're doing a little bit worse . We do 01:19:35.440 --> 01:19:37.607 see variations colossal by differences 01:19:37.607 --> 01:19:39.496 in the some of the systems on the 01:19:39.496 --> 01:19:41.520 aircraft , and we see the impact of 01:19:41.520 --> 01:19:44.400 different fleet sizes as well on the 01:19:44.410 --> 01:19:47.040 mission capability rates we're taking 01:19:47.040 --> 01:19:49.770 in a wide variety of initiatives and 01:19:49.770 --> 01:19:51.992 issues that are articulated in our life 01:19:51.992 --> 01:19:53.881 cycle . Sustainment Plan to drive 01:19:53.881 --> 01:19:56.048 mission capability raising two Dr F 35 01:19:56.048 --> 01:19:57.937 Sustainment outcomes in the right 01:19:57.937 --> 01:20:00.430 direction . Fixing Alice . There's only 01:20:00.430 --> 01:20:02.760 one of those issues . We have 12 01:20:02.760 --> 01:20:04.816 different lines of effort that we're 01:20:04.816 --> 01:20:06.316 undertaking to include the 01:20:06.316 --> 01:20:08.427 establishment , the accelerated stand 01:20:08.427 --> 01:20:10.730 up of organic depose , the use of 01:20:10.740 --> 01:20:12.740 increased maintenance , maintenance 01:20:12.740 --> 01:20:14.962 authorities on the flight line and wide 01:20:14.962 --> 01:20:16.796 variety of other issues that all 01:20:16.796 --> 01:20:18.740 together will continue to move the 01:20:18.740 --> 01:20:20.907 needle in the right direction . Good . 01:20:20.907 --> 01:20:24.770 General FIC and Mr Omer , What 01:20:24.780 --> 01:20:27.430 does the future look like for the F 35 01:20:27.440 --> 01:20:30.090 production ? And how does Lockheed and 01:20:30.090 --> 01:20:32.201 your suppliers think you will be able 01:20:32.201 --> 01:20:32.820 to scale ? 01:20:36.990 --> 01:20:40.440 So we are a Z . You're aware , man . We 01:20:40.440 --> 01:20:43.490 signed the lot 12 through 14 production 01:20:43.490 --> 01:20:45.830 contracts over the course of the last 01:20:45.830 --> 01:20:48.320 fall , and we're currently entering 01:20:48.320 --> 01:20:51.060 negotiations for the Lots 15 through 17 01:20:51.400 --> 01:20:53.178 contracts . I can't talk to the 01:20:53.178 --> 01:20:55.456 specific details of those negotiations , 01:20:55.780 --> 01:20:58.020 but I will tell you that overall , as 01:20:58.020 --> 01:21:00.131 you look into the service budgets and 01:21:00.131 --> 01:21:02.076 as you look into the service spend 01:21:02.076 --> 01:21:04.020 plans , we see that the numbers of 01:21:04.020 --> 01:21:06.020 aircraft in those years are are not 01:21:06.020 --> 01:21:08.131 rising as they did over the course of 01:21:08.131 --> 01:21:10.076 lots 10 through 14 . But they're a 01:21:10.076 --> 01:21:12.140 little bit more flak . Some of the 01:21:12.150 --> 01:21:15.120 flatness of the profile in those years , 01:21:15.300 --> 01:21:17.467 eyes going to challenge our ability to 01:21:17.467 --> 01:21:20.230 continue to drive price down by tail . 01:21:20.560 --> 01:21:22.616 But we're committed to continuing to 01:21:22.616 --> 01:21:24.449 work hard with the department to 01:21:24.449 --> 01:21:27.320 establish the best value for our 01:21:27.320 --> 01:21:29.840 taxpayers and warfighters . Thank you , 01:21:29.890 --> 01:21:30.570 Mr Almer 01:21:34.490 --> 01:21:38.040 ST Go in 2017 we 01:21:38.040 --> 01:21:41.990 delivered 61 In 2018 we delivered 91 . 01:21:41.990 --> 01:21:45.060 Last year we delivered 134 . This year , 01:21:45.060 --> 01:21:47.060 prior to Kobe , we were on track to 01:21:47.060 --> 01:21:49.171 deliver 141 aircraft , so you can see 01:21:49.171 --> 01:21:51.300 the progression of production rate . 01:21:51.610 --> 01:21:53.950 And then we'll actually continue that 01:21:53.960 --> 01:21:55.960 production rise as we go forward to 01:21:55.960 --> 01:21:58.560 approximately 165 aircraft and then , 01:21:58.560 --> 01:22:00.727 as general thick alluded to will see a 01:22:00.727 --> 01:22:03.250 slight decline in production quantities 01:22:03.250 --> 01:22:06.850 probably around Excuse me 155 or so 01:22:07.460 --> 01:22:09.571 in the three lots coming after that . 01:22:09.571 --> 01:22:11.627 So just kind of an overview . Within 01:22:11.627 --> 01:22:13.793 that production rate , we've been able 01:22:13.793 --> 01:22:15.793 to reduce the price of the airplane 01:22:15.793 --> 01:22:18.016 significantly . Eso we had we were on . 01:22:18.016 --> 01:22:20.071 We were on a plan or a trajectory to 01:22:20.071 --> 01:22:22.016 get to what we call an $80 million 01:22:22.016 --> 01:22:24.182 aircraft by a lot 14 . We were able to 01:22:24.182 --> 01:22:27.160 achieve that one lot early in lot 13 . 01:22:27.320 --> 01:22:30.200 And what that really what that allows 01:22:30.200 --> 01:22:32.930 is we are now able to produce and 01:22:32.930 --> 01:22:35.670 deliver 1/5 gen capability aircraft 01:22:35.670 --> 01:22:37.781 really at the price of what a fortune 01:22:37.781 --> 01:22:41.480 legacy fighter would would cost . Thank 01:22:41.480 --> 01:22:42.647 you . I yield back . 01:22:45.800 --> 01:22:49.150 Thank everybody . This is the last 01:22:49.160 --> 01:22:51.760 questioner and I want to thank our 01:22:51.760 --> 01:22:53.760 Panelists for their remarks . And I 01:22:53.760 --> 01:22:55.900 also want to commend my colleagues on 01:22:55.900 --> 01:22:57.789 both sides of the aisle for their 01:22:58.250 --> 01:23:01.680 really informed and passionate concern 01:23:01.910 --> 01:23:04.132 and for participating in this important 01:23:04.132 --> 01:23:06.520 conversation . I would like to yield to 01:23:06.520 --> 01:23:08.960 my colleague and good friend ranking 01:23:08.960 --> 01:23:11.140 member comer for his closing remarks . 01:23:11.900 --> 01:23:13.956 Well , thank you , Madam Chair . And 01:23:13.956 --> 01:23:15.900 again , I want to thank all of our 01:23:15.900 --> 01:23:18.710 witnesses who were here . Our side of 01:23:18.710 --> 01:23:21.820 the aisle here has been focused on 01:23:22.420 --> 01:23:26.010 oversight . It's good to have a 01:23:26.010 --> 01:23:28.490 bipartisan hearing where we all share 01:23:28.490 --> 01:23:30.546 the same goals , and those goals are 01:23:30.546 --> 01:23:32.601 number one to ensure that our troops 01:23:32.601 --> 01:23:35.530 have the absolute best . At number 01:23:35.540 --> 01:23:37.373 Number two is to ensure that the 01:23:37.373 --> 01:23:40.600 taxpayers get their dollars worth and 01:23:40.600 --> 01:23:43.960 you will find no group in Congress 01:23:43.960 --> 01:23:47.870 MAWR in support of the private sector 01:23:47.970 --> 01:23:50.810 than our side of the hour . We know 01:23:50.810 --> 01:23:54.540 that parts and contracting and 01:23:54.550 --> 01:23:57.880 aircraft can be produced in the private 01:23:57.880 --> 01:24:00.600 sector significantly more significantly 01:24:00.600 --> 01:24:02.900 cheaper than the government could . 01:24:03.330 --> 01:24:05.163 Having said that , we expect the 01:24:05.163 --> 01:24:08.160 private sector to deliver on their end 01:24:08.160 --> 01:24:10.860 of the bargain and with prospective 01:24:10.860 --> 01:24:13.750 Lockheed Martin . I appreciate the fact 01:24:13.760 --> 01:24:16.260 that Lockie Barton has a significant 01:24:16.270 --> 01:24:19.270 footprint in America . Lockheed Martin 01:24:19.280 --> 01:24:21.336 employees a lot of people , and they 01:24:21.336 --> 01:24:24.260 pay excellent wages to their employees . 01:24:24.260 --> 01:24:25.982 It's a great place to work . I 01:24:25.982 --> 01:24:28.550 appreciate that . But , Mr Olmert , we 01:24:28.550 --> 01:24:31.750 we've had this discussion about the 01:24:31.760 --> 01:24:34.070 issues with the eels and the issues 01:24:34.070 --> 01:24:37.580 with the F 35 . And considering the 01:24:37.770 --> 01:24:40.370 significant percentage that this 01:24:40.370 --> 01:24:43.860 product IHS with your total sales for 01:24:43.860 --> 01:24:46.082 Lockheed Martin , I certainly hope that 01:24:46.082 --> 01:24:49.200 moving forward , we can get these 01:24:49.200 --> 01:24:51.400 issues resolved for the sake of our 01:24:51.400 --> 01:24:53.330 military , for the sake of our 01:24:53.330 --> 01:24:56.250 servicemen and women on for the sake of 01:24:56.250 --> 01:24:57.972 the American taxpayer . So I'm 01:24:57.972 --> 01:25:01.100 confident that we can get this resolved . 01:25:01.110 --> 01:25:02.950 But I look forward to continue 01:25:02.950 --> 01:25:06.590 discussions with with Lockheed 01:25:06.590 --> 01:25:09.360 Martin with our United States military 01:25:09.360 --> 01:25:12.700 and with the majority in this committee 01:25:12.710 --> 01:25:14.877 with that madam chair , I yield back . 01:25:15.610 --> 01:25:17.832 Well , I I really want to thank you and 01:25:17.832 --> 01:25:19.999 your staff and all of your members for 01:25:19.999 --> 01:25:22.610 joining us in a bipartisan way to work 01:25:22.610 --> 01:25:24.940 on this challenge . And I join my 01:25:24.950 --> 01:25:28.930 colleagues in saying that I , uh I I'm 01:25:28.930 --> 01:25:32.930 very pleased that Lockheed Martin has 01:25:32.930 --> 01:25:35.490 said they are dedicated to resolving 01:25:35.490 --> 01:25:38.630 these challenges and on , Mr Omer 01:25:38.640 --> 01:25:41.020 mentioned that he , or rather Lockheed 01:25:41.020 --> 01:25:42.964 Martin , had already spent over 30 01:25:42.964 --> 01:25:46.550 million trying to correct this 01:25:46.550 --> 01:25:48.717 problem . But I want to point out that 01:25:48.717 --> 01:25:50.883 that is just a small percentage of the 01:25:50.883 --> 01:25:53.410 cost of one plane , especially when you 01:25:53.540 --> 01:25:56.340 add the 50 million that they say is 01:25:56.340 --> 01:25:58.750 needed to maintain the program yearly 01:25:58.750 --> 01:26:01.270 Now , because of the challenges , I do 01:26:01.270 --> 01:26:04.000 wanna say how pleased many of us are to 01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:07.100 learn about the Odin contract that the 01:26:07.100 --> 01:26:09.450 government will be putting forward and 01:26:09.450 --> 01:26:12.050 that the intellectual property and the 01:26:12.050 --> 01:26:14.490 Datta components will be owned by the 01:26:14.490 --> 01:26:16.850 American taxpayer and the American 01:26:16.860 --> 01:26:19.050 government . I believe this should be 01:26:19.050 --> 01:26:22.010 the standard for any military contract 01:26:22.020 --> 01:26:24.530 going forward . I consider this a 01:26:24.530 --> 01:26:27.630 national security challenge because 01:26:27.630 --> 01:26:30.190 there have been so many reports that 01:26:30.200 --> 01:26:33.130 the information has been stolen from 01:26:33.130 --> 01:26:35.660 our contractors through through hacking , 01:26:35.900 --> 01:26:38.990 including allegations that the F 35 has 01:26:38.990 --> 01:26:40.990 been compromised in the information 01:26:40.990 --> 01:26:44.380 stolen . So to have it controlled by 01:26:44.380 --> 01:26:46.620 the government to protect this 01:26:46.620 --> 01:26:49.730 information , I believe is a very good 01:26:49.740 --> 01:26:52.840 step in the right direction . We are 01:26:53.100 --> 01:26:55.390 looking forward to learning more about 01:26:55.400 --> 01:26:58.030 the Odin program and the contract and 01:26:58.030 --> 01:27:00.086 exactly how you're going to spell it 01:27:00.086 --> 01:27:02.200 out so that these challenges do not 01:27:02.200 --> 01:27:05.370 happen in the future in order to first 01:27:05.370 --> 01:27:07.640 of all , protect the safety of our men 01:27:07.640 --> 01:27:09.862 and women in the in the Air Force , but 01:27:09.862 --> 01:27:11.840 also to protect the dollars of our 01:27:11.840 --> 01:27:14.810 taxpayers . Our next meeting will be 01:27:14.810 --> 01:27:18.490 held in September on the F 35 01:27:19.780 --> 01:27:23.300 I am hopeful that the D . C MT . 01:27:23.580 --> 01:27:26.910 Who reported that there was 183 million 01:27:27.150 --> 01:27:30.470 owed to the American taxpayers that he 01:27:30.470 --> 01:27:32.359 had , the report said they are in 01:27:32.359 --> 01:27:36.310 negotiations . I hope by September this 01:27:36.320 --> 01:27:39.080 issue will be resolved and that we can 01:27:39.080 --> 01:27:41.870 learn more about what D . O . D . Is 01:27:41.870 --> 01:27:44.480 doing to modernize our military 01:27:44.490 --> 01:27:47.830 contracting process . It is 01:27:47.830 --> 01:27:49.886 important , first and foremost , for 01:27:49.886 --> 01:27:52.310 the safety and security of the men and 01:27:52.310 --> 01:27:55.070 women in uniform , but also the safety 01:27:55.070 --> 01:27:57.292 and security of the tax dollars in this 01:27:57.292 --> 01:27:59.740 country . I really want to thank again 01:27:59.750 --> 01:28:02.210 all of the Panelists for their life's 01:28:02.210 --> 01:28:04.099 work for their dedication , their 01:28:04.099 --> 01:28:07.120 testimony today and , uh , I must say , 01:28:07.460 --> 01:28:08.960 I believe this is the best 01:28:08.960 --> 01:28:12.040 participation of any any hearing this 01:28:12.040 --> 01:28:14.096 year that I've seen on both sides of 01:28:14.096 --> 01:28:16.310 the aisle , showing deep concern and 01:28:16.310 --> 01:28:19.100 commitment to resolving this issue in a 01:28:19.100 --> 01:28:21.870 positive way for the private sector , 01:28:21.970 --> 01:28:24.290 the military , the government and the 01:28:24.290 --> 01:28:26.570 taxpayer . And I yelled back , and I 01:28:26.570 --> 01:28:28.626 think the staff on both sides of the 01:28:28.626 --> 01:28:31.430 aisle , this was a joint effort . Every 01:28:31.430 --> 01:28:34.210 single meeting was held in conjunction 01:28:34.210 --> 01:28:36.400 with both parties . Every interview , 01:28:36.680 --> 01:28:40.330 every report has been a bipartisan 01:28:40.340 --> 01:28:43.590 effort on this important issue and in 01:28:43.590 --> 01:28:45.990 closing , I want to thank our Panelists 01:28:45.990 --> 01:28:47.879 for their remarks , and I want to 01:28:47.879 --> 01:28:50.212 commend my colleagues for participating . 01:28:50.212 --> 01:28:52.323 With that and without objection , all 01:28:52.323 --> 01:28:54.546 members will have five legislative days 01:28:54.546 --> 01:28:56.490 within which to submit additional 01:28:56.500 --> 01:28:58.667 written questions for the witnesses to 01:28:58.667 --> 01:29:00.778 the chair , which will be afforded to 01:29:00.778 --> 01:29:02.833 the witnesses for their response . I 01:29:02.833 --> 01:29:06.030 ask our witnesses to please respond as 01:29:06.030 --> 01:29:09.770 promptly as you are able . This hearing 01:29:09.780 --> 01:29:10.890 is adjourned .